Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Defiant Rep. Matthew Hill Defends Voting Down Wine in Supermarkets

Posted By on Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM

200px-Rep.MatthewHill3.jpg
Under fire for single-handedly killing the wine-in-supermarkets bill in a moment of pique, Rep. Matthew Hill understandably is feeling the need to explain himself. This evening, he's released a lengthy statement in which he claims the mantle of the Man of Principle, tosses in a dose of anti-Washington demagoguery and lambasts ObamaCare for good measure.

Tennessee is not Washington D.C. Here, we do not ram bills through without first debating the legislation and allowing all sides to present their opinions. The entire nation was outraged, and rightfully so, when those in D.C. pushed through ObamaCare with no debate whatsoever. As a Representative of the people of Washington County, I simply refuse to allow the thoughtful approach of hearing all sides of an issue turn into a meaningless and unresponsive bureaucratic process like so many things in our nation’s capital have unfortunately become.

Here's the full statement:

As Chairman of the House Local Government Committee, I take the legislative committee process very seriously. The committee system is in place to allow lawmakers on both sides of an issue the opportunity to thoroughly debate ideas in an open and transparent environment.

Yesterday, hundreds of Tennesseans were in Nashville to hear arguments both in favor and against House Bill 610, including ten amendments that had been filed by legislators to make various changes to the bill. Unfortunately, when the time came to begin debate on the issue, a motion was made to end all discussion and immediately vote on the bill. A roll-call vote was then initiated and I voted “no” on the legislation.

The reasoning behind my vote is simple: we must allow the committee system the opportunity to do its job — that is, we must give all bills that come before the legislature a fair, open, and honest hearing. This is what our constituents expect and what voters of this state deserve.

When a bill comes before my committee, I cannot in good faith send a bill further along in the process unless I am confident both sides of the issue have had ample time to present their arguments. As an elected legislator sworn to protect the Tennessee Constitution, it is my duty to always conduct the people’s business in a sincere, appropriate, and transparent manner.

Tennessee is not Washington D.C. Here, we do not ram bills through without first debating the legislation and allowing all sides to present their opinions. The entire nation was outraged, and rightfully so, when those in D.C. pushed through ObamaCare with no debate whatsoever. As a Representative of the people of Washington County, I simply refuse to allow the thoughtful approach of hearing all sides of an issue turn into a meaningless and unresponsive bureaucratic process like so many things in our nation’s capital have unfortunately become.

Comments (26)

Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

Most Commented On

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Media (71)


Phillips (58)


Politics (43)


Education (23)


Law and Order (18)


40 Jealous Whores (10)


Crazy Crap (9)


Around Town (5)


Congress (3)


Barry (2)


All contents © 1995-2014 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation