Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Commercial Appeal: Gov. Haslam Way Overstated His Tax Rate

Posted by Steve Haruch on Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM

haslam_bill.jpg
A report by the Commercial Appeal finds that Gov. Haslam actually paid a much lower tax rate than he led on. "So low, in fact," writes the CA's Marc Perrusquia, "Haslam's tax data provides fodder for an emerging national debate over how federal income tax policy benefits the rich." To wit:

The mother lode of Haslam's wealth flows from Pilot Flying J, a nationwide chain of convenience stores and truck stops ranked as one of the most lucrative private companies in the country. Haslam has never disclosed his earnings from Pilot.

Instead, Haslam gave reporters a summary that listed just his non-Pilot income — $28.5 million earned between 2003 and 2008 from a range of investments.

An analysis by The Commercial Appeal found Haslam used a variety of tax breaks to greatly reduce the taxes he paid on that portion of his annual income.

While most taxpayers rely on wages progressively taxed up to 35 percent, the tax on much of Haslam's publicly disclosed income — much of it capital gains involving stocks, real estate and private equity deals — is capped at 15 percent. That's step one.

In a second tax-saving step, Haslam used deductions to write off nearly a third of that non-Pilot income — shielding $9.2 million from taxes, the newspaper found.

What emerged was an effective federal income tax rate that at times was lower than that paid by many middle-class families.

In 2008, for example, Haslam's effective federal income tax rate on his non-Pilot income was just 4.8 percent, lower than the rate of a typical upper middle-class family of four earning $152,000 and nearly as low as a family earning half that.

Haslam's report, which used methodology questioned by one expert, and and which attempted to weigh the impact of both state and federal taxes, claimed a tax rate of 22.2 percent that year.

So it looks like our governor has paid taxes at rates as low as 4.8 percent in recent years, on income he told the good people of Tennessee was taxed at rates as high as 48 percent. Hey, what’s a decimal place or two among friends, right? I think the "emerging national debate" done emerged.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

$152k/year =/= middle class.

report 0 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by Pseudonym on 12/13/2011 at 1:20 PM

$152k per year is pretty plush, actually.

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by 37214 on 12/13/2011 at 1:58 PM

Well, if Mom, Dad and both kids are all bringing home $40K apiece...

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Chris Chamberlain on 12/13/2011 at 3:43 PM

Apparently the Commercial Appeal has direct line to IRS for full 1040 Taxpayer
files or else they have magically devised their own numbers to plug in to come
up with theory for this story!

report 0 likes, 3 dislikes   
Posted by NeverFear on 12/14/2011 at 9:23 AM

Imagine that, a politician who twists the truth in order to present himself to his electorate in a better light. Say it ain't so.

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by dva56 on 12/14/2011 at 9:28 AM

LIke I've said, someone pls explain the logic of a system that taxes a guy making $100K a year at a higher rate than some brahmin making $50 million a year.

report 3 likes, 1 dislike   
Posted by packrat on 12/14/2011 at 10:06 AM

"While most taxpayers rely on wages progressively taxed up to 35 percent, the tax on much of Haslam's publicly disclosed income — much of it capital gains involving stocks, real estate and private equity deals — is capped at 15 percent. That's step one."

That's any incomplete calculation.

Any corporate taxes paid by any of those investment vehicles has to be added to the total. Corporate income is taxed twice - once at the corporate level and again at the individual level on capital gains and dividends.

The stockholders own the assets of the corporation - including the cash used to pay corporate taxes, so that counts as them paying it every bit as much as if they had written the check themselves.

report   
Posted by Gilbert Martin on 12/14/2011 at 10:14 AM

"So it looks like our governor has paid taxes at rates as low as 4.8 percent in recent years, "

I doubt it, since the calculation method evidently left out his share of corporate taxes paid based on his ownership percentages of companies.

report   
Posted by Gilbert Martin on 12/14/2011 at 10:17 AM

The Gov must be a nightmare to manage. You know, 'cause he says really stupid things in public.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Min on 12/14/2011 at 6:50 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation