Showing 1-5 of 5
Don't everyone talk at once! Damn it: If only I'd put "Moonbeam" in the headline."
What is there to say to such inane debate? It is widely held when John Paul II wrote his 1994 apostolic letter, "On Reserving Priestly Ordination to Men Alone," he was speaking “from the chair” and the subject is closed. Under the Code of Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church, canon 751 says Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.
According to 1364, an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication. Not only are these women NOT priests I believe they have brought upon themselves excommunication therefore they are not even Catholic!
And of course a POPE has never been wrong (ask Galileo), nor has a POPE ever utilized his position to further personal agendas and preferences (not even the Medicis), nor objected to a prior Pope's judgements (oh, there was that litle Inquisition thing)...
I am one who has turned and walked away from the RCC. If Christ was on earth today he would have absolutely nothing to do with the heirarchy of the RCC unless he were to throw them out of the churches. The heirarchy is rotten to the core and support only their own power and their own high living.
I was at Bishop Joan’s talk last evening at Vanderbilt. It was really my first up close experience of the issue of the ordination of women in the Roman Catholic Church. I came away very impressed.
Bishop Joan impressed me, first of all, as a woman with both feet firmly planted on the ground. She seems to have done all things well. She is still very happily married at fifty years. She talked about her six children and grandchildren and now two great grandchildren. She taught grade school. She has been involved in the mission of the Roman Catholic Church working in priestless counties in Kentucky.
I think I was most impressed when she departed from the prepared text and talked of her own passion for the equality of women. She spoke of her experience with battered, abused and raped women connected with her work in a woman’s shelter. She linked this to the Roman Catholic Church and the many ways in which it directly and indirectly treats women as inferior and so is implicated in the abuse of women.
Joan seemed challenged and said she would think about the comment to her from a man who is a lawyer and suggested she needed to get tougher in her approach to the church. You know, maybe knocking the bishop’s hat off. She offered that this was not her approach. What she did say, and what resonated with me, is that what really needs to be done is to get the story out. Bishop Joan and the other womenbishops and womenpriests are doing a ministry rooted in the gospel.
This is what also impressed me. Bishop Joan talked about how she already was doing the things a priest would do before she was ordained. And those things were rooted in her day to day experience, like the day she went to visit one of her sick sixth grader’s in the hospital and prayed for him and laid hands on him even though a “real” priest was in the background. She is the one who had the personal connection with the student. I think our present idea of ordination and who can do priestly things is too constricted.
Benedict and some of his bishops can try to build higher and higher walls to keep women like Bishop Joan Houk out. I see a rising tide against all these walls. I’d like to call it grace or the work of the Holy Spirit. This was a very good, even historic evening, at least for me.