Thursday, January 21, 2010

Corker Missed the Email About Tennessee's Energy Message

Posted by Jeff Woods on Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:15 PM

click to enlarge oie_senator_bob_corker2.jpg
While Lamar Alexander was speaking in riddles on the Senate floor today, Bob Corker was brow-beating Energy Secretary Steven Chu about why his department isn't spending more research and development money on one of Lamar's pet causes--nuclear power. During a Senate hearing, Corker said the Obama administration is too focused on more exotic technologies, like solar and biofuels generated from crop waste. "You're slow-walking things that are proven, and wanting to spend lots of money on things that are unproven." Corker said. "It makes me less trustful of the department." Meanwhile, back in Nashville, Gov. Phil Bredesen was touting Tennessee's focus on solar energy and biofuels as the technologies of the future.

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

"Corker said the Obama administration is too focused on more exotic technologies, like solar and biofuels generated from crop waste.
"You're slow-walking things that are proven, and wanting to spend lots of money on things that are unproven." Corker said. "It makes me less trustful of the department."
Corker is right.
Wind and solar are less reliable and more expensive forms of energy generation. They both require some other energy generation source as a backup to provide baseload power. And that backup will be generated by either fossil fuels (coal or natural gas) or nuclear.
Not only that, but the places where the wind and solar are best suited for maximum generation are not usually close to where energy demand is. That adds even more costs to build out the transmission lines to get the power to where it is needed.
Instead we should be building breeder reactor nuclear power plants. It is cheaper, provides a far more reliabile power source and the fuel can be reproccesed and used over and over again virtually forever.
Now that is renewable power.

report   
Posted by Gilbert Martin on January 22, 2010 at 3:57 PM

Do you know how many spent fuel rods we currently have the capability to reprocess in the United States? None. Do you know the last time anyone in the United States tried to build a breeder reactor in the United States? 1982. Do you know why? They're really, really expensive and in a world where extra plutonium is not a great idea, really, really dangerous.
What a nice place it must be, however, where you're always the smartest person on every subject. Do they serve lemonade and cookies there, too, Gilbert?

report   
Posted by Howard on January 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf08.html
See "Fast Neutron Reactors" section.
an exerpt
"Japan plans to develop FBRs, and its Joyo experimental reactor which has been operating since 1977 is now being boosted to 140 MWt. The 280 MWe Monju prototype commercial FBR was connected to the grid in 1995, but was then shut down due to a sodium leak. Its restart is planned for 2009."
Educate yourself Howie.
Other countries are developing and planning to use breeder reactor plants.
There's no reason we can't do the same. The technology of today is not the same as the technology of 1982.

report   
Posted by Gilbert Martin on January 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM

You'd think the Mayor of Wolfsburg would know that that part of Germany is filled to the brim with windmills.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wolfsburg_Merian.png
Also, if nukes are such a good idea, why haven't any been started in over 30 years? A hint:
10. Takes Too Many
9. Too Little Infrastructure
8. Too Little Safety
7. Too Much Waste
6. Too Much Carbon
5. Too Much Emissions
4. Not Suited For Warming Climates
3. Too Slow
2. Renewables and Efficiency are Faster, Cheaper, Safer and Cleaner
1. Too Expensive
http://www.nirs.org/climate/background/top10reasonsnukeswontsaveclimate.pdf
Where do we find these idiots?

report   
Posted by Wolfgang on January 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM

I have always thought like you but have never been able to explain that position clearly. You have given me insight and challenged me to move this dialogue the next step.

report   
Posted by Stan Menton on February 4, 2010 at 12:51 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (61)


Phillips (42)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (19)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation