Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Why the Pro-Life Groups Have to Piss Off the Republicans

Posted by Betsy Phillips on Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:53 PM

Kleinheider posted this little gem from David Oatney today. And, while it should be noted that
click to enlarge he-man.jpg
David Oatney is 95 percent full of shit when it comes to analyzing the things he knows, he does know stuff and people do indeed tell him things. So when Oatney says, "One source inside the House Republican Caucus told The Examiner 'if we lose that race, we're blaming them [Tennessee Right to Life],'" I think we can feel pretty certain that someone in the House Republican Caucus did indeed tell Oatney that. What to make of that? It's easy enough to see why some Democrats court Tennessee Right to Life. Not only is Democratic leadership convinced that they can run candidates as "Republicans-lite" and win, it fits in with the Our Gang He-Man Woman-Haters Club mentality that often emanates from certain factions of the party. And it's easy enough to see why some individual Republicans would get tired of having to toe the exact line the Tennessee Right to Life folks mark for them when the Republican Party in general has been so good to them. But a gal has to wonder, since the TNGOP has been so good to the Tennessee Right to Life people, why would Tennessee Right to Life people thumb their nose at the TNGOP by endorsing The Other Ty Cobb? Yes, I know, it's supposed to be because Tennessee Right to Life will endorse the candidate they think is best, regardless of party. But they don't have to endorse anybody. Why risk the ire of a whole party, especially in the middle of all this SJR 127 nonsense? Ah, but then we start to get an idea, don't we? If SJR 127 is eventually ratified into the state constitution, it will be the pinnacle of achievement for anti-abortion groups in the state. The great battle will have been fought and won just about as much as it can be won until Roe is overturned, if it ever is. The other stuff that the Tennessee Right to Life folks agitate about? None of it riles folks up or brings in the money like abortion does. The fact is, if the Tennessee Right to Life folks (and others, like David Fowler's group) win the SJR 127 war, they have a big old problem. They've achieved what most folks think is their goal. No politician worth his salt is going to actually believe that they can generate the same kind of political energy and money about banning birth control pills or preventing human cloning. When SJR 127 passes, the air goes out of the pro-life groups' balloon. Any power they have to swing elections or bring in money is pretty much gone. And who wants that? Being a big shot is fun. Having your endorsement courted feels good. Being able to bring money and influence to the table matters. So here we see the stirrings of a new game--try to piss off the Republicans enough that anti-choice legislation starts to stall, so that you don't become obsolete. This case is clearly deliberate self-sabotage in the service of self-preservation. It'll be interesting to find out if we see more of it.

Tags: , ,

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

If we amend the state constitution as proposed in SJR 127, that will intensify, not diminish, the legislative battles between the pro-life and pro-choice groups in Tennessee.
If the amendment passes and Roe v. Wade stays intact, the Tennessee legislature will revisit those issues --- a waiting period, informed consent, and a hospitalization requirement--- that, for now, are blocked by the state constitution as interpreted by the Tennessee Supreme Court. On the other hand, in the unlikely event that Roe is overturned, Tennessee ( and every other state) will face a legislative decision as to whether any kind of abortions should be legal in this state.
Though I often wish it were otherwise, the Right to Life folks are going to be a powerful force in Tennessee politics for a long time to come. Endorsing the occasional Democrat---and winning---ultimately strengthens their position because they are not beholden to one party.

report   
Posted by Henry Walker on September 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM

Henry nailed it. Passing SJR 127 only strengthens Tennessee Right to Life.
Endorsing a pro-life Democrat that looks like he's winning a special election against a Republican that waffled on pro-life issues is just good politics for them. Win and they have a friend in the Democratic Caucus. Lose and watch Marsh fall all over himself to prove how pro-life he is before Fall 2010.

report   
Posted by The OG Ben on September 22, 2009 at 6:53 PM

You really dont know Tennessee right to life or the people in it if you think they would intentionally do something to hurt the passage of sjr127.

report   
Posted by The Rep. on September 22, 2009 at 7:28 PM

I thought their endorsement was just a way of trying to depict themselves as something other than an arm of the GOP, which they most assuredly are.

report   
Posted by Anon on September 23, 2009 at 10:21 AM

TNRtL is similar to other self-imagined 'revolutionary' movements. They are not so much about a specific issue like abortion or choice as advocates for on-going change.
If abortions were outlawed tomorrow, there would be members of TNRtL who would want to move on to the next challenge because they see the victory as incomplete. And always will.
This might be the sexualization of the culture or the decline in parenting or another related issue. As the Redlegs officer says in 'Outlaw Josey Wales,' "There ain't no end to doin' good."
Of course the Right to Life people are not alone. The obvious Tennessee example is the 'gun rights' movement which managed to hijack much of the Legislative session.
But it bears mentioning that the same pattern can be seen in other movements. Some feminists viciously turned on women who supported Senator Obama over Senator Clinton because they saw it as a betrayal of women's rights. Other feminists still blame the patriarchy for everything from global warming to tanktinis, citing the works of Andrea Dworkin and Susan Brownmiller. There is little sense of true victory because with such a victory, they would no longer have a cause to lead.
The vast majority of advocates for Right to Life issues and the vast majority of feminists are good people who have little interest in single issue politics or cultural revolution.
But revolutions have certain dynamics and one is the appearance of 'true believers' who try to gain control of the meaning of the Revolution. By defining what it means to be pro-life or feminist, they exert almost total power. Dissent is crushed by characterizing critics as sell-outs or worse.
Traditionally American politics has been impervious to this sort of extremism but over the last forty years or so, it seems like more and more issues are taking on this sort of conflict.

report   
Posted by Mark Rogers on September 24, 2009 at 12:05 AM

When SJR 127 passes, the air goes out of the pro-life groubeps' balloon. Any power they have to swing elections or bring in money is pretty much gone.
I must disagree with this statement - these TNR2L nutbaggers (at least according to the TNR2L well-hidden "Bible Quotes" web page anyways - you have to look through the site index to find the BQ web page) believe that life begins at or even before conception...
Sweet Jesus, I wish that someone would clue these homefooled holy-rollers and snake dancers about the definition and usage of allegory within Semitic poetry from the Bronze Age!
More to the point, there is not any specific biblical prohibition against abortion to be found in either the Old Testament or the New Testament - abortion is not specifically prohibited within the "Ten Commandments"; Moses did not specifically prohibt abortion within any of the 613 laws recorded with the Torah, and; neither Jesus or his disciples ever specifically prohibited abortion as recorded within the New Testament.
http://www.tennesseerighttolife.org/human_life_issues/human_life_issues_biblical_quotes.htm
Zeitgeist, The Movie (free dvd download)
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/dloads.htm

report   
Posted by Elmer Gantry on September 28, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation