Monday, August 24, 2009

Cooper For Public Option Before He Was Against It, Or Something

Posted By on Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM

click to enlarge jimcooper.jpg
In a stock letter from Blue Dog Rep. Jim Cooper, posted on the comments section of the Daily Kos, a constituent gives us a glimpse into the health care reform obstructionist's baffling reasoning.

It goes something like this: Even though I have stood, arms locked with the GOP, in the path of a public option, I don't really have a problem with the public option even though the bill I'm pushing does not provide for a public option. So I can say I'm not against a public option and do everything within my ability to prevent its passage. The letter after the jump:

There are already four different bills reported out by House and Senate committees, with one more expected to come from the powerful Senate Finance Committee in the next few weeks. The main House legislation, H.R. 3200, the America's Affordable Health Choices Act, has been amended in different ways by the three House committees of jurisdiction. I recently wrote an article in the Tennessean saying that I would not vote for H.R. 3200 as currently drafted.

No one knows yet exactly what the bill will look like that the House will vote on, probably in September, but it will probably be another version of H.R. 3200. We still have a long way to go in the legislative process because, assuming the House passes legislation, and the Senate does as well, then the differences between those two bills will have to be worked out before final votes in the House and Senate.

As a member of the fiscally conservative group, the Blue Dog Democrats, I have been working to see that health reform legislation is affordable, as the President has requested. My preferred approach, the Healthy Americans Act, H.R. 1321, is bipartisan, reduces the deficit, and reduces the cost of health care over time. Unfortunately, House and Senate leaders have not allowed it to be seriously considered although it seems to meet all the President's goals. Although this bill does not contain a "public option," I can support one as long as it is on a level playing field. There are many ways to define a public option and Congress should be able to approve one that keeps insurance companies honest without putting them out of business.

Tags: , , ,

Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Media (73)

Phillips (51)

Politics (41)

Woods (27)

Education (26)

Law and Order (14)

Around Town (11)

Crazy Crap (9)

40 Jealous Whores (5)

Cavendish (4)

All contents © 1995-2015 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation