Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Hooray! Eric Crafton's Possible Anti-Discrimination Bill Covers Everyone

Posted by Caleb Hannan on Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:57 AM

click to enlarge Eric Crafton: Still full of revolutionary ideas.
  • Eric Crafton: Still full of revolutionary ideas.
Last week, Eric Crafton was one of eight white men Council members to vote against Metro's new anti-discrimination bill. The long overdue bill simply tacks on the words "sexual orientation and gender identity" to the current law which already protects for things like age, sex and race. In short, it's exactly the kind of bill that God-fearing old white dudes might have a problem with. But they can't just come out and say "Gay people don't deserve the same rights as everyone else." Instead they have to tie themselves into rhetorical knots when explaining their opposition, using lame excuses like the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act already has us covered on a Federal level or, in Crafton's case, claiming they don't know how "sexual orientation" will be defined by the ordinance. So fine. Despite the fact that semantic somersaults are one of Crafton's bread-and-butter evasive maneuvers, we took him at his word and tried to get him to elaborate on his reasoning. Sure enough, he made exactly as much sense as you'd expect.. First, Crafton tried to play the "but what about everyone else?" card:
The way (the bill) is shaping up now, we're going to be excluding a lot of people who might like some protection. What if I'm overweight? What if I'm short? What if I'm a Democrat and my boss is a Republican?
When we helpfully pointed out that people choose their political affiliation and have some manner of control over whether or not they're fat, Crafton tiptoed around the old "they're gay because they want to be gay" routine:
Well, there's some debate whether other things are under your control or not. There's a lot of scientific debate. But that's not really the issue.
Oh, but you just made it the issue! Ya hear that gays? Mr. Crafton is still not convinced that you aren't choosing to be discriminated against. Because correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't not being able to marry the person you love, not being able to visit them in the hospital when they're sick and not being able to adopt kids just fabulous? No. Well good, because again, that's not really the issue. Finally, in case you thought Crafton was just some stick-in-the-mud who likes to come up with inane reasons for not endorsing reasonable legislation, we'd like to point out that the man does have his own ideas:
I really don't care whether somebody's gay or not. And I don't think we should discriminate against people. In fact, I'm looking at introducing a bill that says we can't discriminate against anybody for anything at any time.
No word on whether this Forever Walking on Eggshells bill would cover patent idiocy. If so, we're liable to think Crafton's introducing it just to cover his own ass.

Tags: , ,

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

A+

report   
Posted by Christy Frink on July 28, 2009 at 8:16 AM

Yes, of course, obesity is NOT a complex, many-faceted problem with deep physical and psychological roots. Since it's a just a lifestyle choice, those lazy fat asses deserve any discrimination that's flung their way. It's their own damn fault. If they can't be slim and fit enough to meet the standards of those with delicate sensibilities, to hell with them. If they don't like it they can just put down the cheeseburger and get up off the couch. Right?

report   
Posted by jamiealex on July 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Alright, jamiealex. I'm not sure who loaned you the key to my subconscious but I'd like it back now, thanks.
See, originally, I had this parenthetical aside where I tried to qualify the idea that being fat was somehow a choice. Ya know, something that acknowledged what you just said: that it IS a "complex, many-faceted problem with deep physical and psychological roots."
But then I got on myself about using parentheses as a crutch. And then I started thinking how I need to stop writing so breezily and tighten, tighten, TIGHTEN. And in the end, I just left all that crap out and assumed people would be with me when I glossed over the whole obesity thang.
Good on you for calling me out.

report   
Posted by Caleb on July 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Does Crafton know something we don't, or did Westboro Baptist Church just have a typo in their "God Hates Fats" signs?

report   
Posted by Brent on July 28, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (13)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation