Friday, July 10, 2009

Mayor Dean, May Town and Political Backbone

Posted by Caleb Hannan on Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:19 AM

click to enlarge Anyone seen this?
  • Anyone seen this?
This might take a second to parse. So please bear with me. May Town is dead. Again. Or, for now. Whatever. More accurately, the debate over May Town has been temporarily set aside, most likely to be revisited in the near future. When May Town was at the locus of Nashville politics, however, the city's most visible leader was, at best, implicitly against the $4 billion dollar development or, at worst, dubiously neutral on the issue of whether or not to build a second downtown out of whole cloth. Bruce Barry made the case that the Mayor's proxy vote in the Planning Commission might have betrayed his own feelings towards May Town. And, when faced with direct Are you for or against it? questions, Dean did at least accent his side steps with a clumsy soft shoe about how Nashville needed to continue its focus on building downtown. But did he ever come out and say how he stood, one way or the other? No, he didn't. Why? That we don't know. But what we do know is this: Mere weeks after May Town took its place on the political back burner, Dean is set to become the recipient of some very large checks provided to him both indirectly and not by the same people who, one could argue, he took extra care not to piss off... On July 22nd, Dean will be attending a fundraiser sponsored by Joe Hall of Hall Strategies, the lobbyist who made unsuccessful attempts to stymie Aunt B and her wall-to-wall coverage of dead Indians in Bells Bend. A couple weeks later (I'll confirm when exactly when I get the confirmation from Dean's fundraiser), he'll be playing the same featured role at another fundraiser, this one for fellow May Town lobbyists Waller Lansden. OK. So first lets dispense with any illogical outrage that might distract from the real point. Politicians need money. Even politicians two years away from an election with no known opposition at this point. What Dean is doing has precedent both among Nashville mayors and mayors of probably every major city in America. Glad-handing. Back-slapping. Check-writing. Nothing to get too pissed off about. What is worth getting pissed off about is this: What did Dean have to lose by actually stating his real opinion on May Town? What if, instead of proxy votes and ambiguous quotes, we actually had some hard-and-fast unequivocals. Like Jesus Christ, this is a stupid idea! Or, in the interest of political palatability, At this time, I regret to announce that, much as I appreciate the grand vision of its creators and the passion with which they've pursued their dream of a sweet office park in Bells Bend, I can not give my approval to May Town. Would anyone at these upcoming fundraisers have hesitated for a second when it came time to pull out their check books? Of course not! Because Dean is still the Mayor -- for the next two years, and likely more. And May Town, despite being quite the golden goose, is not the only interest that Joe Hall or Waller Lansden are paid to support. I guess this is just an attempt to understand what exactly would have been lost if Dean had shifted out of neutral. Because in the narrow, largely naive confines of this little mind, it'd seem Dean would be much better off, both with the public and the lobbyists (who need an occasional reminder that they still answer to a boss), if he exhibited some political backbone.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

I can't pretend to know the subtleties of our current political climate, and what Dean's standing is within it, but: I think one of the first unwritten rules of politicking is that if you can wiggle by with ambiguity, do it.
Political tides ebb and flow.. yesterday's enemy is your pal, etc etc. Strong, opinionated politicians litter the dustbin of history. Sad fact, but there it is. It's the same reason that there's a direct correlation between the success of a politician and their relative centrism. By taking the middle path, you have more to gain from both sides of the aisle than you ever do from the extremes of one alone.
So, I think the question instead of "what did he have to lose?" instead is "what did he have to gain?"

report   
Posted by Chris Wage on 07/10/2009 at 8:42 AM

(Note: I don't condone such machiavellian maneuvering, but that's why I'd never make a good politician.)

report   
Posted by Chris Wage on 07/10/2009 at 8:43 AM

Dean doesn't have to do anything to win favor with lawyers at Waller. He attended law school with most of them and his wife once worked there. He's known most of those people for 25 years. They're his boys.

report   
Posted by Teddy on 07/10/2009 at 10:02 AM

During the campaign, I thought the allegation (courtesy of Woods, via bitter ambulance chasers who supported Briley) was that Dean had doled out work, as law director, to Waller in exchange for support as part of some sinister master plan to run for mayor which he had been harboring for years. So now it's vice versa?
Also, calling Waller simply the "May Town lobbyists" is a vast oversimplification. Waller has plenty more interests than that, which admittedly may not be a good thing.
As to your ultimate question, I think Dean has larger things on the horizon, e.g. the takeover of the school system, which will require all of political chips he has and he may not have felt inclined to weigh in on an issue which he perceived there to be enough public opposition to take it down by itself.

report   
Posted by ScottJ on 07/10/2009 at 10:32 AM

At this rate Caleb, you're never going to supplant the Mayor's Office masseurs at the City Paper with the soft touch they reserve for Mayor Dean. If you ever want a cushy spot near the courthouse communications office you're going to have to stop asking critical questions and throw them the slow pitch to plant deep in the bleachers. A puff piece will write itself if the communications people don't do it for you first.
Now excuse me while I go find a way to link this post to another audience.

report   
Posted by S-townMike on 07/10/2009 at 11:47 AM

Ha, I laughed out loud when I read that "wall to wall coverage of dead Indians" line.

report   
Posted by Aunt B. on 07/10/2009 at 12:41 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation