Monday, June 22, 2009

Corker Blows Off Meeting with Sotomayor

Posted by Jeff Woods on Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:59 AM

Sen. Bob Corker blew off his meeting with Sonia Sotomayor last week. Hobbling along with her leg in a cast, she was 10 minutes late and he said he didn't feel like waiting. "I decided to proceed on to the next meeting," he told a Tennessee Press Association breakfast in Chattanooga. Oh well, it's only the Supreme Court.

Wasn't Corker the least bit interested in asking the judge about all the criticism coming her way from conservatives like Sean Hannity? According to them, she's a wild-eyed judicial activist bent on twisting the law to fit her personal liberal agenda. She's anti-gun and pro-abortion!

We're wondering whether Corker still intends to vote on Sotomayor's nomination? Who knows? That might inconvenience the senator, too.

Update: Corker's flack says the senator has rescheduled his meeting with Sotomayor for tomorrow.

Comments (18)

Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

I made a terrible mistake. I listened to the clip while eating breakfast.
Senator Corker is obviously a very busy and important man. Since Supreme Court nominee Sotomayor was apparently only given ten minutes from the start. After all, if her appointment was longer than ten minutes, the good Senator would still have had time to visit with her without going on to the next appointment.
So, you really need to give him a break here. He must have supplicants lining up to seek his wisdom, counsel, and sheer raw power, on a ten minute at a time basis. Think about it, he has to heal the sick and give comfort to the suffering all day long. It must be tiring. Surely, you can forgive him for not seeing some wild eyed liberal precedent follower.

report   
Posted by Karl Warden on June 22, 2009 at 6:31 AM

Can't we vote this clown out of office?????

report   
Posted by Pat on June 22, 2009 at 6:45 AM

Corker had to run to an appointment to give Hannity a blowjob.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 22, 2009 at 8:21 AM

It was just a photo op for Sodamayer. What's the prob?

report   
Posted by Confused on June 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM

Yeah, "photo op" -- as if Sonia Sotomayor, who I've seen countless times on television with the president and with senators who actually have power, cares about having her picture taken with the blowhard junior senator from a state that has no significance on the electoral map.
The purpose of this is for the nominee to answer questions from senators who, under the checks and balances process set by the Constitution, confirm or deny her nomination to the supreme court. I guess Corker didn't have any questions for the nominee. A very responsible senator.

report   
Posted by The OG DG on June 22, 2009 at 9:17 AM

So, the important questions have been asked and answered by, as you put it, "senators who actually have power", I again ask...
what's the prob?

report   
Posted by Confused on June 22, 2009 at 9:25 AM

I guess the prob is that we have a hissybitch in Washington instead of a senator.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 22, 2009 at 9:45 AM

It's interesting that nobody has pointed out that if you are an obscure federal judge whose appointment to the highest Court in the land requires Senate approval, you might want to be on time for those meetings.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM

unbelievable... sort of.
I am offended by his complete and utter lack of respect. and, she is “only” a candidate for the United States Supreme Court.
I will be so glad when Phil Bredesen runs for the u.s. senate in 2012. he will blow the little man out of the water... oh, and more importantly, he can match the little man dollar for dollar $$$$$
Bredesen for Senate in 2012!

report   
Posted by monique p. on June 22, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Nor has anyone pointed out that, by Capitol Hill standards, 10 minutes late is on time. Or that it also doesn't behoove you to abruptly end your meeting with some long-winded senator so you can rush down on your crutches to the next one with Bobhorn Leghorn.
In Washington, bailing out on someone who's just 10 minutes late suggests that (a) you didn't care about the meeting to begin with; (b) you're playing some weird variant of "gotcha" to impugn the other person; or (c) you're the kind of person who worries about whether anal retentive should be hyphenated.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM

"It's interesting that nobody has pointed out that if you are an obscure federal judge whose appointment to the highest Court in the land requires Senate approval, you might want to be on time for those meetings."
Especially if you're on fuckin CRUTCHES.
Sorry, Minimum Bob strutted right off the edge on this one.

report   
Posted by The OG DG on June 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Then again, as someone pointed out earlier, if you're an obscure senator whose vote isn't going to make any difference, perhaps people are going to show up fashionably late to your office.

report   
Posted by Anonymous on June 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM

I think the explanation is quite simple. He had to run to the bathroom because he's full of it.

report   
Posted by sueyyyy on June 22, 2009 at 3:05 PM

I wouldn't want to talk to that stupid bitch either.

report   
Posted by Scott on June 22, 2009 at 3:17 PM

That's going to be Associate Justice Stupid Bitch to you, you teabagging douche.

report   
Posted by The OG DG on June 22, 2009 at 3:56 PM

Evidently, common courtesy isn't as common as I thought.

report   
Posted by Mark Mayhew on June 22, 2009 at 4:03 PM

"Evidently, common courtesy isn't as common as I thought."
I agree. It is the height of discourteousy to be late for a meeting with a United States Senator.

report   
Posted by Emmett Flatus on June 22, 2009 at 4:08 PM

I feel there is much more that can be added to this piece of writing. Wishing for a follow-up blog post about the same subject.

report   
Posted by Myrtle Roal on March 14, 2010 at 12:54 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (65)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Film (21)


Arts and Entertainment (21)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (15)


Media (12)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation