It is now coming out that several of those police chefs [sic] may not have been as excited about the governors over ride [sic] on the gun bill as he would like people to believe. We are now finding out they were all in town for some convention or other and were asked to come over and meet the governor during a break. Of course most of them went. When they got there they were all piled in together and finally told what it was about just shortly before the signing of his veto with them as the backdrop. They did not come to the event knowing they were about to be used.What could explain all this whining? We're thinking that legislators must have heard it from constituents on this bill over the weekend. Maybe they're finally figuring out that reasonable people actually don't think guns in bars is such a wonderful idea.
Showing 1-22 of 22
First of all, that the taxpayers are on the hook for police chefs is crazy considering the budget mess. What next? Police nannies, butlers and such? Second, that Campfield is such a dumbass that he thinks the governor "over rides" the bill. No, Stacy, he vetoes it and then you and your pea-brained redneck ilk override it.
Let's hope that the six million Tennesseans that don't have carry permits - in other words, the vast majority of Tennesseans that know allowing guns in bars is a bad idea - are standing up and raising hell with morons like Campfield and Todd.
Poor Jeff, he's such a moron. Obviously, he didn't even bother to actually READ the bill.
So when the Commercial Appeal posts a searchable database of private citizens who have carry permits they are 'mak[ing] state government more transparent' and upholding the First Amendment. When TFA compiles a list of public employees who appeared in uniform (thus representing that they are acting in their capacity as police officers and not private citizens) they are 'making it more convenient to harass these law officers'.
Nope, no double standards here . . .
So Brucie, you're saying that since the TFA does it, it's okay for the newspaper to do it?
I also don't believe that the newspaper includes a blog posting that urges its readers to contact the bosses of the people on the database to harass the people on it, like the TFA does.
No double standard there, huh?
Wow...the idiocy is ASTOUNDING.
Thank God for people like Bruce Krafft.
What some simpletons call "harassment" we call "making accountable". See, the govt does not have the same rights as citizens. Try reading the documents your country was founded on. These were tax payer-funded public servants LOBBYING YOUR GOVERNMENT and attempting to INFLUENCE LEGISLATION. It is despicable and ANTI DEMOCRACTIC. YOUR LEGISLATURE THAT REPRESENT YOUR STATE passed this into law with HUGE MARGINS. Serpas shows that he HATES THIS CITY AND THE STATE OF TENNESSEE by doing this. Serpas has been crossing the line for years and we've finally broken his sphere of influence over local govt. and he's not the only one, apparently. THAT is why we want their names. So that these PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO OWN GIANT HOUSES PAID FOR BY LAW ABIDING TAX PAYERS can be held accountable for such unethical, ANTI AMERICAN behavior. The next bill that goes to the house should be a bill targeting PUBLIC SERVANTS LOBBYING THE TN GOVERNMENT and abusing their positions in attempt to dictate the law.
Now...
You have NO inherent right to have the government provide you with permit information. It is a ridiculous practice and that is why we will eventually have the records sealed. Just like I can't go pull your driver ID info, medical history, social security info...you shouldn't be allowed to troll through govt records in order to harrass private gun owners. And you won't, shortly. The govt should ASSUME everyone is armed and rightly so. Up until a few decades ago, NO ONE would ever take people like you seriously. SLAVES are disarmed. The right to free speech and to own weapons for self defense is the PINNACLE of freedom. You take a right that your ancestors could never hope to have (thanks to tyrants and dictators) and you piss on it because you've been CONDITIONED to do so.
Gunaphobes are mentally ill. Seriously. It is a MENTAL ILLNESS to be afraid of inanimate pieces of machinery. CRIMINALS DO NOT CARE ABOUT A LITTLE INK ON A PIECE OF PAPER.
Again...it is a mental illness.
I like being called mentally ill. I also would like not be worried that someone who has had too much to drink and doesn't like the way I do a slow start from a stop sign is not going to reach over and shoot me. Why can't all the second amendment folks move to Texas and vote to secede? After they finished defending themselves from each other, those who are still standing could try to find the next state to join them, like Montana or Alaska.
Thanks for proving my point. If law abiding people with a better record with their weapons than police worries you than I don't know what to say...again, its most likely due to your obvious mental illness that has made you paranoid and illogical.
You suggest that permit holders are out shooting people when the data shows exactly the opposite.
Again...it is a mental illness.
I suspect most of the useful idiots supporting this bill haven't read any of it. It doesn't allow carry in bars. For you mouth breathers out there, that means establishments that derive most of their income from sale of booze. What it does permit is carry in resturants that derive a minor portion of their income from the sale of alcohol and the majority of their income from the sale of food. It also prohibits the consumption of alcohol by those armed customers.
This is typical PSH by the know-nothing hoplophobes.
PeterT.
Your smugness / condescension is interesting. Have YOU read the bill? If it turns out that you haven't...does that make you the useful idiot, mouth breathing know-nothing? Can you quote the text that backs your assertion?
I look forward to your response :)
http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/106/Bill/HB0962.pdf
PeterT.,
On second reading I am confused by your post. You say "useful idiots supporting this bill" (which would be the pro 2nd Amendment position) and then you go on to mention hoplophobia. My apologies if you support the right to carry in restaurants.
Here we go again, the 2nd Amendment haters still don't have a clue as usual. PeterT wrote correctly, in Tennessee, we don't have bars; we have establishments (restaurants) that less than 51% of their proceeds are derived from the sale of alcohol, period. sueyyyy said, "Why can't all the second amendment folks move to Texas and vote to secede? After they finished defending themselves from each other, those who are still standing could try to find the next state to join them, like Montana or Alaska." Maybe sueyyyy you should go to New York or D.C. to live since that's where allot of those of your persuasion are found.
Furthermore ...
The 2nd Amendment is one the reasons that you people that disavow it are able to have YOUR right to speak and write the idiotic shtick that you do, i.e., the 1st Amendment. Just remember, when the time comes that we that believe in the 2nd, protect those of you that would ridicule us (and it's coming sooner that you might think); just say thank you and go on; thanks will be enough, we are law-abiding citizens and need no more than that. When HB962 is vetoed and the restaurants that choose to still post "NO FIREARMS", I and many others will cease to enter those establishments. When you 2nd Amendment haters are confronted with a REAL criminal, remember that someone could have maybe saved your life or your property.
A couple of things to ponder ...
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (infringed is all inclusive as is all your rights governed by the First Amendment, remember that!)
“The police cannot protect the citizen at this stage of our development, and they cannot even protect themselves in many cases. It is up to the private citizen to protect himself and his family, and this is not only acceptable, but mandatory." - Jeff Cooper
Annoy a Liberal...Use Facts and Logic
Bob in East Tennessee
Thanks Bob in East TN!
You have so succinctly revealed the overwhelming unspoken desire of the 2nd amendment whackos.
There will come a point where the armed citizenry will become so large and threatening that you will overwhelm the local law enforcement agencies. At that point you will finally be free to shoot the fucking shit out of everyone and everything without impunity.
The Amerikan Duhreem: No taxes! No cops! Lotsa guns!
Just like, Afghanistan!
Typical. Those in favor of sensible reasonable concealed carry by honest citizens use logic and historical precident to make their case. Those opposed use speculation, fear, and "what if" fairy tales to demonize their opponents.
Here's a thought, if someone gets drunk, hauls out a gun, and starts shooting up a bar, then they have no respect for the law in any case. What exactly makes you think this particular legislation will somehow magically make them obey? Pretty much the same issue as the National Parks thing. Folks who are up to mischief will do so in any case. The rules are only followed by the respectable citizens, the ones you probably want armed in case of trouble. So once again bad people do bad things so we have to punish the folks who didn't do anything wrong and prevent them from access to the tools necessary for their self protection.
Waaaa...Waaah.
I type 10 feet away from my gun and 12 feet away from my liquor cabinet.
Good thing my gun doesn't drink or that could be dangerous.
Hey I'm not a bully Jeff, but I did fire off an email to Fox (anlong with a link)regarding your commercial use of their Simpson's character.
[CUE NELSON VOICE] Ha-Ha
Rights prohibitionist freaks used the law for years to deny the citizens of many states their Constitutional rights. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, all they can do is call names. We don't care. We're just going to reverse all these bad laws and leave you crying. Thank you for determining the strategy.
"There will come a point where the armed citizenry will become so large and threatening that you will overwhelm the local law enforcement agencies. At that point you will finally be free to shoot the fucking shit out of everyone and everything without impunity."
I've got news for you, the armed citizenry is already large enough to overwhelm. However, there is no desire by us to do anything more than be left alone with our God given rights non infringed, no more, no less.
Thanks 'the real motive', you prove my point. This type of drival is all we ever hear from those of you who are so liberal that it hurts .... and hurts you not us! As far as your American Dream [that's how it's spelled ;-)] comment; if taxes it is then let it be flat rate, cops have their place in our society; just not as my protector, and lotsa guns; yeah your exactly right - the more of us that carry, the better our chance of survival in your small world of wantabe socialism.
My weapon is to protect me and mine from the likes of you and your kind when they try to envelop my life with the sort of tyranny that Hitler and his like placed on the people. Read your history and see that repeating history is not what those of us who firmly believe in the 2nd Amendment's purpose want to or will see.
Annoy a Liberal...Use Facts and Logic
Bob in East Tennessee
Now that the veto has been over-ridden, the language inside the bill will allow toddlers to frequent bars and order booze while carrying 88mm flak cannons.
No I haven't actually read the bill, but some supporter of the Brady Campaign told me this and that's all I need to know.
/snark
Recent imaging research suggests bullies' brains may be hardwired for sadism. Using function Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), images of bullies' brains showed that inflicting pain stimulated the brain pleasure centers of males who are unusually aggressive, but showed no activity in brains of normal males.Too bad we can't look at brain images of the gun freaks in this story, huh?
Ethic Soup blog has a good article on this research at:
http://www.ethicsoup.com/2008/11/bullies-may-be-wired-in-brain-to-enjoy-others-pain.html#more