Thursday, May 28, 2009

Convention Center: Dallas Mayor Begs Feds for Hotel Funds

Posted by Caleb Hannan on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM

click to enlarge begging-dog.gif
A friendly reminder: This Sunday, the convention center debate sponsored by Scene, half the Metro council and ALL GOD FEARIN' PEOPLES THE WORLD OVER will take place at Vanderbilt's Blair School of Music from 2-4 PM. In an effort to get you, Pith reader, off your butt and into the gloriously air conditioned Steve and Judy Turner Recital Hall, here's another remind of why this issue is like, uh, really important and stuff... Every city reads from the same playbook when it comes to building convention centers. So when you consider a city like Dallas, it's helpful to picture them about four pages ahead of Nashville. Whereas we've spent the past decade waltzing our way towards a new center, Dallas has spent roughly half that time trying to build an adjoining hotel. Earlier this month, the city finally reached an end point, shooting down a referendum that would have blocked the $500-million, publicly-owned* hotel. The only problem: It's almost impossible to finance. *Remember this in a couple months, when city leaders start pitching a hotel funded by a public-private partnership. Shit don't work that way no more. It's the cities money. Marriott, Hilton or Sheraton just sign the lease. Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert went to Washington last week to beg the House Financial Services Committee to help pass a bill that would make municipal bonds, like the ones he's trying to sell to build the hotel, more attractive. As it stands, bond investors don't see municipal bonds to be the safest bet (and they probably shouldn't, seeing as how cities like St. Louis have already defaulted). As a result, interest rates are prohibitive. The solution: Ask Congress for relief! Nashville gets wrapped up in this whole mess because we're dealing with the same market. And that's our dirty little secret. For all the talk about whether a new convention center is a civic priority at the moment (an argument in which we've offered our own opinion), little attention is being paid to the fact that you can't build something you can't fund. Dallas has high interest rates. As do we. Something our bond guy from Goldman Sachs even said as much at a council hearing last month. Something to think about for Sunday. See you there.

Tags: , ,

Comments (1)

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Oh hell no. The mayor of Dallas wants the federal government to back revenue bonds???!!! What a crock of shit.
"Frank said municipal bonds carry an unfairly high interest rate given that they are a fairly safe investment. "
The man is totally clueless of why revenue bonds exist. One of his staffers should Google "WPPSS" for him and tell him what happened to all those fairly safe revenue bonds in St Louis. The entire reason these types of bonds exist is to give officials a back-door for getting unsound government projects the opportunity out of the eye of the unclean and stupid electorate. Houston officials will be glad to tell him why revenue bonds were a bad decision as well.
The last thing congress should do would be making it painless for city officials to sell revenue bonds. They carry higher interest rates than general obligation bonds for a damn good reason.

report   
Posted by JeffF on 05/28/2009 at 3:06 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation