Monday, May 18, 2009
Legislature A Quick Question
Posted by Betsy Phillips on Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:34 AM
Comments (15)
Showing 1-15 of 15
like
dislike
Great point...so I guess our only option is the communist manifesto...right?
This paper sucks.
Yes, Kevin, that is exactly our only option.
Jesus Christ. You know, some sites have actual literate trolls who make amusing points. And poor Pith gets people with no reading comprehension, who can't understand a joke, whose most profound thought is "This paper sucks."
Can you not even try? Seriously. You can't even try to make a fucking point that's, oh, I don't know, something more profound than what a drunken fourteen year old can come up with?
Ha...I would destroy any of you in an open debate. I have challenged Mr. Woods many times and he won't even respond to me. You cowards hide behind web pages and make lame jokes about issues you can't even comprehend. I wish it were more complex than that but it isn't. You people are morons and your paper sucks.
That's it.
You write a smug sentence without even making a point, call it "journalism" and then expect to be taken seriously. You can call it a joke but jokes are normally witty. You are far from witty.
None of you would last two minutes in a proper debate. If I am wrong, then let's prove it. I'll give you a call on the phone, we'll record it, and then I'll upload it to youtube and you can "blog" it...Deal?
And tell that cowardly bootlicker Jeff Woods to stop hiding and put his money where his mouth is...
Believe me, Kevin, they don't pay me enough to talk on the phone to you while you indulge your fantasies. And no one on youtube wants to see what you do in the privacy of your own home while you have a girl on the phone.
But I'm curious about your stock tip for Woods. Is there still money to be made in cowboy footwear?
(Ha, see?! That was pretty damn funny, too.)
Hilarious. Thanks for making my point for me.
The only thing you've posted thus far that is even slightly humorous is the fact that you demand to get paid before you'll stand up for your twisted (or lack of?) principles. Funny, I saw Neal Boortz get the same challenge and he said the exact same thing. He demanded to get paid before he would stick up for himself. You guys have a lot in common, it seems.
No wonder you're all afraid of guns. You guys don't even have the guts to take a phone call and stick up for yourselves. Funny how confident ya'll are hiding behind your blog.
Pretty "pith" poor, Betsy...but at least we now know you choose rhetoric over substance and are too cowardly to put your money where your uneducated mouth is...now we know how seriously to take your "journalism".
I can see now why Woods ignores you, Kevin. Good lord. Rather than actually listening to what folks are saying, you just take bits and pieces of it and bloviate. I tried to be subtle about it, but let me be plain: what you're doing--not engaging with me, but twisting my words to suit your point--is masturbatory.
And there's not a chance in hell that I'm going to get on the phone with you and listen to you while you verbally masturbate.
Piss and moan all you want, but, if you have a problem with Woods or with Boortz, take it up with them. As for me, you don't know my stance on the Second Amendment, you don't know my level of education, you don't even know if I'm a journalist or not. Which just more proves my point that you're looking for any object against which to spurt off.
Why would I want to listen to you do that?
Again, rhetoric over substance. When all else fails...use the word "masterbate".
You dish it out:
"You know, some sites have actual literate trolls who make amusing points. And poor Pith gets people with no reading comprehension, who can't understand a joke"
... but when it's thrown back at you, you throw a little temper tantrum like a f%cking 4 year old.
My problem is not just Woods, but The Nashville Scene, which used to be something worth reading. It seems now they only employ cowardly leftist elitists who slept through civics class.
" you don't even know if I'm a journalist or not."
Actually, its pretty obvious you are far from it.
:)
Oh, please. "You started it?" That's your argument? Dude, let me be clear. I'M LAUGHING AT YOU. I'm not mad. I'm not throwing a tantrum. I'm MAKING FUN OF YOU because you come to a place you clearly don't like and piss and moan because it's a place you don't like. Then you make stuff up and think that, if you say it in an aggressive enough manner, that you win.
Okay, fine. You win.
Ha, see? Not nearly as much fun as you thought it would be, is it?
And, while you're mulling that over, please, explain to the room how someone can be uneducated and elite? Or, again, are you just throwing some words out there without giving any thought to what they actually mean?
No, that isn't my argument. I'm just pointing out how laughable your righteous indignation is...
I read your idiotic blog.
"You don't know my stance on the Second Amendment".
http://tinycatpants.wordpress.com/
Yes, I do. You are just another cowardly leftist elitist blowhard with a keyboard.
And your the dumbass who has just admitted to hanging out in not one, but two, places he hates with people whose views he finds distasteful.
But please, keep going.
My compliments to whoever is creating the remarkably pathetic, laughable persona of "Kevin."
No real human would ever stoop to such a sustained conceited, ignorant, whiny barrage of self-inflicted damaging comments.
It is obvious that someone is making fun of people with cretinous mindsets by pretending to be one named "Kevin."
