Thursday, May 7, 2009

Maytown: Same Old Elephant, But With Shinier PR

Posted by Pete Kotz on Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM

click to enlarge urban_sprawl.gif
A word from Vanderbilt doctor and Scottsboro resident Brenda Butka, on how the Maytown development remains the animal that can't dance, no matter how shiny the PR she wears... It's baaaack! Maytown, the zombie development--still the elephantine city-in-the-cowpasture, accessible only by helicopter, canoe, and a threadlike country road. Nothing has changed, except the promises, which are getting more frenetic, and the PR, which is glossier, and the powerpoint presentations, which are even more imaginative: We'll build the first bridge, we'll pay for conservation easements for the neighbors, we'll do telephone pushpolls all over the county (4 different sets so far), we'll send out big shiny postcards promising jobs, we'll donate land, we'll make a clever website, we'll promise to stop building whenever you say, we'll pay for everything-- heck--we'll even farm. It's just going to be the cutest little city, surrounded by a ruffle of placid agriculture--you'll hardly know we, and our 15-story hotels, 40,000 workers, and 5,000 condos are even there. We know those other elephants couldn't really dance as promised--Metrocenter, Bellevue, even Reston, Virginia--and in fact went broke, had to be bailed out or sold off. But this one, this one will be different, this one will be airborne on the wings of property tax income for us all. The facts are these: Jack May and Frank May and Tony Giarratana won't ever develop Maytown--they don't have the experience or resources. They want zoning to change so they can sell to other developers. This isn't a development; it's land speculation, which would bring unimaginable profits to a tiny handful of investors. Infrastructure costs for pasture-to-Emerald-City transformation are enormous, and neither the planning commission nor these speculators have put forward the first estimate of the taxpayer's burden for water, sewer, interstate access, schools, power grid, fire houses, police, garbage pickup or road maintenance. All of these concerns have been blithely swept away by glittering promises of new tax income. And, if they build it, who will come? More than a million square feet of downtown Nashville's 7.1 million feet of office space is vacant--can we really use 10 million more? Thirty-seven percent of downtown Nashville is vacant land. Only 6 percent is over 5 stories tall. Do we really want a new hotel in a pasture? Don't we really want to keep on developing the heart of Nashville? Do we want 5,000 more condos on the other side of Briley Parkway when there are a thousand available right now downtown? The plan for Nashville calls for distinctive neighborhoods, not generic office parks and concrete boxes for chain outlets. We already have Nashville's most distinctive neighborhood -- the green spaces where gardening never went out of style, whooping cranes drop by, and the neighbor kid graduating from college is coming home to make a living farming. This is Nashville's back yard--gritty, personal, and quirky. This is part of the real Nashville, the one that has made Nashville a hot spot for the creative under-thirty crowd, the Nashville that's nimble, clever, acknowledges heartbreak, and isn't like anywhere else. Isn't that what we want? Not empty promises, hidden costs, and a fantasy that the tax dollars will roll in? Maytown is an illusion, a mirage of a city-in-a-pasture, a massively unwieldy and unsustainable thing. Even tricked out with a fringe of green, it's still an elephant in that tutu, and the only people making money are the barkers outside the tent selling tickets to hopeful idealists. But that dog won't hunt, it's still a turkey, we're being sold a pig--lipstick and all-- in a poke, and the elephant's never gonna dance.

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

They should call it Greedtown - Hey May Family why don't you fix up Belle Meade Plaza, Hill Center is going to kick your arse over there...........and Tony G. has some f'n nerve trying to sell this junk! He made a decent profit at the Viridian, but the poor people that bought late will have many years before they break even on those high-priced dumps!

report   
Posted by Anonymous on May 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Why y'all want to protect the office market in Cool Springs an other suburban areas-- at a cost to the Nashville job market and tax base-- is a complete mystery to many of us.
I can assume why the writer you post is opposed to the project. They live in a large, expensive house, on a large multi-acre lot and want that lifestyle preserved in every sense. Even rich folks feel the tug of NIMBY. I get that.
But I'm not rich. I don't live on a huge wooded lot. My kids go to public schools and I see no reason to assist the ring counties in raiding our business base. Maytown, as I understand it, will compete with the suburban office market. It's not a threat to downtown-- for gawd's sake do a little research for once.
I'm for growing this county in a smart way. I'm for expanding our tax base and fighting aginast the sururban sprawl. You should be too.

report   
Posted by NR on May 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM

This is gonna crater like Los Colinas.

report   
Posted by Taterman on May 7, 2009 at 4:52 PM

I was on the receiving end of one of those push polls last night. It came across more of a survey than a "did you know that John McCain has an illegitimate black baby" polls, but the agenda was still very clear.
They asked, among other things, whether I'd be more likely or less likely to favor May Town Center if I knew that:
(a) They were going to fund a multimillion dollar technology center there for TSU
(b) They were going to build a nice bridge
(c) They were going to set aside a lot of acreage (900 acres?) for parks and greenspaces
(d) they were giving $1 million to Bells Bend residents to help them keep out further development (presumably, that meant more people like May Town Center)
(e) here's the tricky one: They mentioned that the area either was or could be zoned for up to 700 homes if May Town Center is not built. This gets to the point about the hidden agenda. Is the real plan to turn the place into Subdivision City?
In the end, I told them I was against May Town Center as currently planned, but for none of the reasons they presented.
For one thing, I'm highly dubious of the claim that it will bring in the promised number of companies and tenants, at least not without cannibalizing a lot of what's currently in the downtown/Gulch areas.
Second, as I told the survey caller, if they draw anywhere in the neighborhood of the number of people they claim, the infrastructure will be completely inadequate. One bridge won't be enough, and Metro would be on the hook for the bill.
I'm not unflinchingly opposed to the IDEA of such a development in Bell's Bend. I suspect we're living in a fool's paradise if we think an area so close to the city is going to remain pastoral and undisturbed for the long term. But the plan for May Town Center is going to have to be changed, and become more credible, before I'd go for it.

report   
Posted by bubbadog on May 7, 2009 at 7:23 PM

I would like to repeat for emphasis that one bridge will not be enough. Especially if that one bridge requires people to get off 40 and then get off of Briley and drive out past the prison, when all any fool with a map has to do is look and see that the obvious spot for a bridge is right off 40.
But of course, they don't want to bring that up because they don't want the people living in that neighborhood to start pitching a fit.
And then, let's not forget that the exit off of 40 onto Briley is only done heading west. So, if there are people living in west of town who want to work in May Town Center, we need to have a serious talk about the logistical problems of getting them off the interstate, through those traffic lights, and onto Briley headed north without completely screwing up everyone who comes in from the west's commute.
Part of the reason I think this is an enormous pile of BS is that something like MTC can only work if it's easy to get to. And yet, the developers keep saying "No, we won't ruin the rural feel. We'll only have one bridge. We'll keep OHB two lanes. It won't have an exit directly off of I-40."
Well, then, that's going to be a fucking traffic nightmare, if anyone will actually bother to make the effort to get out there.
I think what we folks who live in these parts are most afraid of is not that it will become another Cool Springs. Our fear is that it will become another 100 Oaks, a place no one went to because no one could get there.
If we have to give up some farm land to have a vital development, well, that will suck but change comes. But if we give up all that open space to have a ghost town? That's going to suck even worse.

report   
Posted by Aunt B. on May 7, 2009 at 9:49 PM

I happened to be painting yesterday when I stubled across a presentation on local government acess TV about Maytown Center by the developer, Planning Commission staff, and a TSU representative to members of the Commission Board and a few things really threw me off. The first was the statement that a light rail system would bring people to their jobs/homes-is this really feasible? Who's going to pay for this new addition to the project? I was also once again appalled that TSU has spent so much time putting together plans for an agricultural research center, like Research Triangle in VA/NC or Silicone Vally in CA that relied on strong university partnerships- a very worthy project indeed but obviously the university is being used to sell this project to the Commission and the city. The honorable thing for the Maytown people to do, if they are really sincere about wanting to invest in TSU, is to give the land to them whether or not the project goes through, so the school is not held as ransom for the project. It was also amazing to hear every progressive idea/terminology used to sell the project, from sustainable to environmentally friendly, etc. It's as though Maytown is being dressed up in whatever clothes are needed to sell this thing at any given moment to any possible person. Integrity is not a word that can be associated with this development effort. I just hope members of the Planning Commission can keep their heads about themselves and not be swept into the game of mirrors being perpetuated by the developers.

report   
Posted by Michele Flynn on May 7, 2009 at 10:47 PM

The honorable thing to do is to put some time into gathering the facts. The honorable thing to do is to understand what you're talking about before slandering the motives of others.
As has been reported in the media, the gift to TSU is not conditioned on the project or any zonging change. It is absolute.

report   
Posted by MT on May 8, 2009 at 9:22 AM

To think that nothing will happen to all that land is insane. If you are commenting on this and have never drivin down old hickory blvd. please stop until you have made the trip. The bend is huge. I have lived there for twenty years, and other than a lot of land a few sod farms and a failed park there is not much else to say about it. If anyone thinks that the Mays will just give up and throw away their investment they are stupid. Bells Bend has the potential to be the place to be in the whole STATE not just nashville. If maytown does not come through a neighborhood will, and everyone will wish maytown had happened.

report   
Posted by BellsBend on January 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (61)


Phillips (42)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (19)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation