Monday, May 4, 2009

Scumbags of the Week: Father Kills Own Son, Mother Coked Up During Birth

Posted by Brantley Hargrove on Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM

This is in no way intended to be a Mother's Day Pith preliminary. Simply file among "Worst Parents in the History of Parenting and Parents."

Exhibit One: Lateshia Coleman, a 34-year-old woman whose son died 16 days after his birth in
click to enlarge Lateshia Coleman
  • Lateshia Coleman
June. He wasn't here very long because when he was born, police say his mother tested positive for cocaine, marijuana and opiates at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. After the Department of Child Services handed the case over to Metro Nashville Police, an investigation led to a recent indictment. Coleman is now in jail, which may not be entirely unfamiliar to her. She's been booked on suspicion of prostitution, shoplifting and possession of paraphernalia in the past. Now she's charged with reckless homicide and aggravated assault.

click to enlarge Marcellous Lindsley
  • Marcellous Lindsley
Exhibit Two: Marcellous Lindsley, 27, brought his fatally injured 18-month-old son to Southern Hills Medical Center in 2006, claiming he'd fallen out of bed. The boy died from internal injuries. Detectives have determined Coleman's story is, in fact, complete bullshit. He's now charged with 2nd-degree murder and aggravated child neglect.

So here they are, Pith readers, your scumbags of the week--scary, mean-looking, wholly scummy and generally bad felons.

Tags: , ,

Comments (18)

Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

Wait. Is there a step missing in the Coleman part? Did the baby die of a drug overdose? Or did Coleman neglect him? Or did she leave him with Marcellous Lindsley or what? Because otherwise I'm not seeing the line from "she did drugs" to "and now her baby's dead."

report   
Posted by Aunt B. on 05/04/2009 at 12:25 PM

There are children every day born addicted to drugs and sadly, parents are only prosecuted if the child dies. Meanwhile someone else is left to pick up the pieces of these children's lives which starts with weaning them from the drugs ingested in utero by their mothers and usually ends ends with a life time of learning disabilities and developmental delays. Where are all the pro-lifers when someone carries a child to term offering support to these kinfolks and foster families who can never get enough resources to right this wrong?

report   
Posted by Temporary Guardian on 05/04/2009 at 12:57 PM

I have custody of a child that was born to a drug addict. It may not be the right thing to say, but I feel some children are better off dead. Instead, they have to suffer the psychological after mass of whatever their parents smoked, injected or snorted.I realize that it's not the child's fault, so I pray and hold on. I think that both of these parent and any other that bring harm to a child (especially death) will burn in HELL.

report   
Posted by spoiled138 on 05/04/2009 at 3:27 PM

Aunt B, the woman was full of drugs when she gave birth to the baby and was likely using over the course of her pregnancy. So yeah, I think it's safe to say the baby wasn't long for this world because of that.

report   
Posted by Hargrove on 05/04/2009 at 3:53 PM

yes Temporary Guardian, certainly this wouldn't have happened if abortion were free and available to anyone and everyone, anytime before crowning begins. idiot pro-lifers, they just want to keep crack babies alive to spite the families.

report   
Posted by pockey on 05/04/2009 at 4:13 PM

I'm honestly not trying to be difficult, but, while using drugs over the course of your pregnancy is a bad idea, it doesn't usually directly result in the death of your kid. Using drugs can cause premature birth, which might lead to the baby's death. Or it might cause infection, which might lead to the baby's death. Or there's even some evidence that there's a correlation between a woman's drug use while pregnant and SIDS. But it's not just self-evident that, if a mother does drugs, and the baby's born with drugs in its system, the mother therefore assaulted and killed the baby.
And, I hate to even bring this up, but you have completely missed the most important aspect of this story. They're charging a woman who took drugs with an assault on another person. But she didn't give the baby drugs after it was born. So, Tennessee is now claiming fetal personhood to the extent that a woman can now be charge with assault on another person for something that happened at a time when it's not clear there's even a legal person there.
That's a pretty big deal--a change in the definition of who a legal person under Tennessee law is.

report   
Posted by Aunt B. on 05/04/2009 at 4:53 PM

To further my point--they didn't charge her with any form of child abuse. Is that because a fetus isn't legally a child? They didn't charge her with delivering drugs to another person. Is that because they aren't sure if drugs were the cause of death? Are they not sure they can technically prove she delivered drugs to another legal person?
There's a lot interesting here, that has some pretty huge ramifications. What if a woman has a car accident that is her fault and she miscarries her late-term pregnancy. So her actions caused the death of her fetus, as clear as day. Is the state going to charge her with reckless homicide? What if a woman just loses a pregnancy at 8 months? Will the police investigate to see if there are signs that her actions caused it? And, if so, what will the cut-off be? Will women who are five months along and miscarry be subjected to criminal investigation? What about three months?

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Aunt B. on 05/04/2009 at 5:06 PM

Aunt B. raises some excellent questions. Questions overlooked in favor of the "here's a couple of scumbags" angle.
I fail to see the value of the "Scumbags of the Week" post anyway. Besides causing a reaction of "That's horrible!", it's rather pointless. Unless maybe a person commenting brings up legitimately interesting and possibly significant legal questions totally ignored in the post.
At the very least, balance the SOTW post with a GG/GOTW post - Good Guy/Gal of the Week. Ideally, have that post and totally drop the scumbag one.

report   
Posted by Marvin on 05/04/2009 at 6:00 PM

Aunt B, you bring up an incredibly interesting question, but I think its relevancy hinges on "fetal." Had the baby died in the womb and she been subsequently charged, that would represent a change in enforcement we could only begin to grapple with. But the child was born and then died as a result of her drug use, so I don't see the charges as a terrible stretch. It's certainly a question up for argument, though.
Sorry Marvin, but SOTW is here to stay, if only to showcase the limitless depths to which humanity can sink. You won't find any contrived "pat ourselves on the back" bloggage here.

report   
Posted by Hargrove on 05/04/2009 at 7:01 PM

I just wonder where the Pope was and that all loving God of the little innocent fetuses. No way this fetus was guilty of anything except nature nurturing and the parents too. Too bad drugs don't kill the sex drive completely.

report   
Posted by sueyyyy on 05/04/2009 at 8:07 PM

Did I miss the repeal of the principle of innocent until proven guilty during my afternoon nap?

report   
Posted by bb on 05/04/2009 at 9:34 PM

I have to agree with what bb and Aunt B said, but mostly i agree with Marvin. Maybe I'll incorporate a "scumbag" article of the week over at my place.
This type of "story" is the worst kind of pandering, and The Scene should be embarrassed by it.

report   
Posted by Mack on 05/05/2009 at 11:34 AM

Did I miss the repeal of the principle of innocent until proven guilty during my afternoon nap?
Did the Metro court system start picking jury members from commenters on blogs, or are you confusing folks' right to form beliefs and state opinions with right to due process in the court system?

report   
Posted by JohnnyC on 05/05/2009 at 6:44 PM

Good to know I can come to Pith for a weekly showcasing of "the limitless depths to which humanity can sink."
And they say journalism is dying.

report   
Posted by Marvin on 05/05/2009 at 8:10 PM

Maybe it's the uppity Marxist Negro in me, but I'm guessing we're not likely to find any well-to-do white folks down in those "limitless depths" anytime soon.

report   
Posted by Sam Holloway on 05/05/2009 at 9:11 PM

Everyone who had something bad to say about my cosin lateshia coleman should shut the fuck up.You don't know the whole fucking story and don't know what she was going through to make do drugs in the first place.You all are stupid and dumb and mean ass hell.You shouldn't judge her cus ya don't know the what happened in her life.So Shut the fuck up stupid bitches.

report   
Posted by Markia Coleman on 05/28/2009 at 10:20 PM

I'm putting forward 2 more candidates for scum who kill their children: My active alcoholic ex-husband, M. Braunstein and his equally sick and equally dedicated to her addiction alcoholic wife K. McKenna.
My beautiful 32 year old son,Ben, who also suffered addiction disorder, but was in recovery for years, had a relapse this June 28th, while on a business trip to London for his father's company. What contributed to his relapse? A number of things, but most significantly, his father's constant invitations to join him in his drinking, which, in order to bond with this piece of scum, he did - which had the direct effect of leading him back to his primary drug of choice, which killed him.
My son's death leaves his wife and his brother and myself devastated. It leaves his infant daughter fatherless. It leaves his father and his step-mother drinking and crowing about 'turning over a new page'. I can only wish they were jailed like these other parents. But that will never happen, they are not only white, but wealthy. Now I hope that a just God will consign them both to Hell for eternity. I'm afraid that mine is not such an uncommon story. How many parents of children killed as a result of driving drunk (or killing others) supplied the liquor/drugs - and drank w/their children and walk around w/no accountability? These 2 have an 11 year old daughter, who they will most likely also kill - or cause to kill. Like I said, I can only hope for an eternity in Hell for them. And I do this in between praying for a miracle that will interrupt their addictions and end the cycle of their killing destruction.

report   
Posted by Daisy on 08/08/2009 at 5:39 PM

Advancements in fertilty are at all time highs, as evidenced by the nadya suleman, and he ivf procedure is currently being hampered by the negative news of one irresponsible doctor. The practice of fertility treatment has been around for quite some time and it works favorably to bring new life.

report   
Posted by Trang Peightal on 01/25/2010 at 11:27 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation