Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Supreme Court May Rule on 'Choose Life' License Plates

Posted by Brantley Hargrove on Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:16 AM

click to enlarge choose_20life.jpg
After losing a federal appeals court decision in Chicago affirming the state's refusal to mint Choose Life plates, an anti-abortion group in Illinois is asking the Supreme Court to take another look, according to the Times.

We're a little less progressive here in Tennessee. In fact, as anyone who's driven .05 miles on any Tennessee street knows, Choose Life plates have already been issued by the state. That could change depending on how the Supreme Court rules on this, if the justices do at all.

Here's what's at stake: Teaparty tinfoil-hatters and the like will be the first to decry big government and any incursion it makes into their lives. Yet when it comes to quite possibly the most personal issue in a woman's life, they're rah-rah Big Brother and his authoritarian thumb fixed firmly on her reproductive rights. You know, I'm not sure I'm ready to let go of that piece of irony. But I'm conflicted, because it always struck me as off-putting and inappropriate that a state-issued tag can advertise one side of a politically polarizing wedge issue.

In all likelihood, that will be exactly what the Supreme Court examines. If the justices decide the license plates convey state speech--which I think any reasonable person would say they do--then the First Amendment argument goes out the window.

Tags: , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

No need to get rid of pro-life plates, lets just get pro-choice plates made. I'm sure you would see lots of those on the road. What steps must be met to get a plate into circulation? And it would really piss off the pro-life people so its really a win win.
What would the image on the pro-choice plate be?

report   
Posted by Pro Evolution on April 28, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Advocates tried (several times) to get a pro-choice plate. The problem is that in this state, the creation of a specialty plate requires a vote by the general assembly. They refused to pass legislation creating the plate (even though all other requirements were met). This was the subject of a lawsuit brought by the ACLU of Tennessee. ACLU won in lower court, but the 6th Cir. reversed, holding that the plates were "government speech," and therefore, the government had no obligation to allow free speech. Click on my name for more information.

report   
Posted by Me on April 28, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Thank you Me. I did not know that. That sucks. If they get the baby license plate, why can't we have one without a baby? Doesn't seem right does it?

report   
Posted by Pro Evolution on April 28, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation