Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Thanks, Rep. Eric Watson, For Reminding Us Of the Yellow Man's Sins

Posted by Pete Kotz on Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:28 AM

click to enlarge He may have been really skinny, but looks can be deceiving
  • He may have been really skinny, but looks can be deceiving
In the legislature's continuing debate over a bill to express regret for slavery -- an intellectual throwdown not seen since Weekend at Bernie's -- Rep. Eric Watson raised the exciting prospect of an entirely new species, the Hispaniel. He claimed that "Both sides, Caucasian, Hispaniels, African-American, are all guilty of this [slavery] back in the 1800s."

Watson didn't elaborate on his discovery -- believed to be part dog, part human, with an ability to both fetch and do lawn work. But the ensuing excitement obscured his reference to a forgotten species: the "yellow man."

The yellow man was also responsible for slavery, according to Watson. During the mid-1800s, when he controlled the Greater San Francisco laundry market, the yellow man could be seen emerging from his shanty to say things like, "Where the white women at?" and "I'll take the egg drop soup."

History books are sketchy, since they're naturally slanted against the Caucasian. But it's believed the yellow man was a menacing figure of that time, says Watson. He took our jobs,  didn't speak English and occasionally wore a weird-looking ponytail. Sometimes he would enslave stray dogs and exotic fish.

So while the legislature continues to debate whether it regrets slavery, we owe a thanks to Rep. Eric Watson. If not for him, we would have forgotten that servitude came in a rainbow of colors, and could be way more insidious than the garden variety slavery we've all come to know and love.

Comments (16)

Showing 1-16 of 16

Add a comment

What the "yellow man" means in the context of apologies for slavery is discussed here.

report   
Posted by John Lamb on April 15, 2009 at 6:59 AM

John, I read your blog and you are either very naive or are one of Watson's people doing a very poor job of damage control. Referring to Asians as "the yellow man" is a very well-known slur. Just because you haven't heard of it does not make it any less hurtful...especially when used in public by an elected official. Arguing that it isn't one makes me think you are most likely one of Watson's cronies.

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Smashville on April 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM

I think the specific reference to Sumterville trumps any other possible meaning. Here is the relevant excerpt from the Sumpterville "yellow man" story:
"On June 20, 1820, April appeared in the Sumter District courthouse in Sumterville. Described in court papers submitted by his attorney as a 'freed yellow man of about 29 years of age'..."
Watson specifically mentioned Sumterville, and this particular "yellow man" story is commonly used to resist apologies for slavery. Watson is not talking about "yellow" people in general; he is talking about a specific "yellow man" and his specific story.
For the reasons I articulated in my post, I'm troubled by Watson's referring to this story in the state legislature.

report   
Posted by John Lamb on April 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM

John, you're an idiot. No one needed it explained to them. AND your explanation is wrong.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Dave on April 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM

I used to looooooove "What Makes the Red Man Red" from Disney's hit Peter Pan.

report   
Posted by Ashley on April 15, 2009 at 9:47 AM

The giant picture of an Asian man painted yellow didn't tip you off? You realize Watson was just talking out of his ass and that Gilmore was just trying to get him to shut up, right?

report   
Posted by Smashville on April 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM

Ashley, isn't that now hidden in the secret vault with "Song of the South"?

report   
Posted by Smashville on April 15, 2009 at 9:53 AM

Wait, wait, does the Sumterville story refer to a "high yeller?" This is even worse than I thought!

report   
Posted by stellabardo on April 15, 2009 at 10:02 AM

Dude, Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature.

report   
Posted by Walter S. on April 15, 2009 at 10:35 AM

Am I thte only one who hopes The Yellow Man cross-breeds with the Blue Man Group to see if we get Little Green Men?

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Jon on April 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM

You sure he didn't mean this Yellowman?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko46_aXW_94

report   
Posted by Jack on April 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Smashville, they were both around when I was a kid in the mid-to-late '80s. I even had a Disney sing-along tape that featured Uncle Remus and oh, sweet baby jesus, a 45 that told the fucking tar baby story and it came with a picture book. This was like 1987. I forgot I even had that until now. Clearly my family was trying to make me racist.

report   
Posted by Ashley on April 15, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Appreciate the attempt to find meaning in Watson's meandering, John, but at the bottom of all this is a very weird resistance to simply regretting slavery. I'm not a big fan of playing the race card, but that's the only motive I can come up with for their strange resistance. And when the guy starts talking about the yellow man, he seems to be locking up my thesis.

report   
Posted by Pete Kotz on April 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM

Pete, thanks for the comment. I encourage you to read the description of my research on the popularity of the Sumpterville reference, and also my conclusion, over at my original post on HispanicNashville.com.

report   
Posted by John Lamb on April 15, 2009 at 12:32 PM

I read your story, John. Good job of fishing out the back story. I'm not so much offended by what he said. The bigger worry is that all these people are spending all this time avoiding simple regret for slavery, and that's his motive here. Who doesn't regret slavery? It's scary that so many of our legislators believe it's politically popular to resist this. That doesn't speak well of the Tennessee countryside.

report   
Posted by Pete Kotz on April 15, 2009 at 2:49 PM

I found a web site is Thailand that sells those fish oil pills that take care of the fatty acids. I am not sure that they are healthy to eat but I am tempted by the cost. Any suggestion how to have better control over the quality of my diet supplements?

report   
Posted by fish oil on January 16, 2010 at 7:28 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-16 of 16

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation