Wednesday, March 25, 2009

A Nonapology Apology: Will Legislature At Least Express Regret for Slavery?

Posted by Jeff Woods on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:04 AM

It's certain to bring a noisy invasion of Confederate flag-waving rednecks to the Capitol. State Rep. Brenda Gilmore is offering a resolution expressing "profound regret" for slavery and racial segregation. Her resolution, which would make Tennessee the seventh state to express contrition in one form or another for slavery, cleared a House subcommittee this morning. But the chairman, Rep. Gerald McCormick, R-Chattanooga, made a point of recording his vote as no. Afterward, he explained: McCormick: I voted no because it's something that happened 160 years ago. I wasn't alive when we had slavery so I didn't feel like I should apologize on behalf of the people of Tennessee. I do regret that it happened. It was a horrible, horrible thing. But I didn't have anything to do with it, so that's why I voted against it. Q: Do you anticipate other lawmakers having the same reservations? McCormick: Sure, I think so. In no way do I think it was right that we did that thing, I say we, but our ancestors did that thing. I don't know that mine in particular did. So it's kinda hard for me to apologize on behalf of people who have been dead for 100 years. That's all I'm saying. I didn't make a big speech in the committee meeting because I know it's a sensitive subject to some people. But sometimes you have to vote your conscience even if it's not the popular thing to do, and that's what I did in there. Q: It doesn't require you to apologize for anything. It expresses regret. Why not express regret? McCormick: I'm expressing regret right now. I do regret it. I wish it had never happened. I wish it hadn't happened for the last 10,000 years either. But me apologizing for it on behalf of the people of Tennessee doesn't mean anything. Q: But you guys pass all kinds of goofy resolutions saying this and that. McCormick: Well, and this is another one, that I'm not voting for. How about that? Gilmore, a black Democrat from Nashville, noted after that she's not asking the legislature to make an unambiguous apology--something that New Jersey, Alabama and North Carolina have done. Instead, her resolution would express regret but stop short of saying we're sorry. That's what the rest of the states passing such resolutions--Florida, Maryland and Virginia--have done. And that's what President Clinton did in 1998. Asked whether she thinks her resolution will pass, Gilmore said, "I just don't really know. I'm simply asking for an expression of regret. I'm not asking for an apology. I'm certainly not asking for any monetary reparation or anything like that. So I'm not certain why anyone would feel they can't vote for this. But I'm going to pray and hope for the best."

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Good grief! These goofballs have to get their knickers in a twist about just saying slavery was a bad thing? How do these people get elected? No, don't tell me. Their constituents are even stupider.

report   
Posted by stellabardo on March 25, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Legislators are not just being asked to say slavery is a a bad thing. Apologizing implies that they're somehow responsible for slavery. However, institutionalized slavery is part of the very distant past. I could take this line of thinking to its absurd conclusion and ask, when are the Normans going to apologize for conquering and enslaving my people 1000 years ago? I think everyone would be better off directing their energies toward ending the international slave trade that persists to this day. To say I'm responsible for your problems because of my white skin is merely a different color of bigotry.

report   
Posted by Joe Carmen on March 26, 2009 at 1:01 PM

slavery has been happening for thousands of years, why the big deal now?
I say if they're going to "regret" slavery they should also regret the native americans killed off over the last 500 years. Catawba, Cherokee, Chiaha, Chickasaw, Mosopelia, Muskogee, Natchez, Shawnee, Tali, Tuskegee and the Yuchi tribes were all in Tenessee in the 1700s, how many are left? Is the legislature regretting what happened to them too?
Of course not. Can't we just focus our attention on going forward and stop focusing attention on what happened 160 yrs ago? No one today was alive back then, so what good will a bunch of politicians saying "we regret it happened" do? I think there are bigger issues to worry about that affect us today that they should be focusing on.

report   
Posted by James on March 26, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Sure, give them an apology, then give them a one way ticket back to Africa!

report   
Posted by Randall McCarthy on March 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Kudos to Joe Carmen! The vast majority of slaves in this country today are white and Hispanic women, so I guess these people don't matter to those who demand apologies for something that started nearly four centuries ago. Go to the Spanish monarchy for your apologies! They just want to perpetuate their fake victim status and make the fat cash grab from those who need to feel guilty about something. Free black men owned thousands of slaves back in the Antebellum South, so maybe the race hustlers should start by apologizing themselves. It's a variation on the same theme.

report   
Posted by Chad Foster on April 1, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation