"I'm just glad I was able to present it. The point was, when you're talking about reproductive health, our constitution protects us and our privacy and our rights. If we're going to change the constitution, then it needs to be done equally. At this point, I don't think that's happening. Women's rights are being diminished and the same isn't happening on the other side of the equation. But hey, you win some, you lose some."
Showing 1-3 of 3
Good Lord, does your leftist partisan hackery have to be so evident in each and every one of your articles?
"the obvious point that men are willing to trample on women's reproductive health rights but not their own."
-Uhhh, what men? Which ones? If you made this comment about women people would call you sexist....which apparently you are.
But in any case, you don't really have much of a point. Women are free to get their tubes tied just like men should have no problem get a vasectomy.
Here! Here! Oh, aren't they quick to yell "Not in MY Pants, you don't!" There is nothing in the TN Constitution that protects a man's right to a vasectomy. So why were they so boisterous in killing the proposal. Good for you, Rep. Camper. After all, it does take two capable bodies to engage in a reproductive sexual congress.