Showing 1-1 of 1
Against what is there to take a stand? I suppose he should take a stand against freedom of the press, illegal search and seizure, trial by jury, etc.
Since when did illegal have anything to do with reality? It amazes me how the same crusading group of individuals can rail against Constitutional violations of individual freedoms from previous administrations (federal - and rightly so), and then view the 2nd amendment with incredulity. Pick and choose, eh? Pick and choose. Let me guess, you conveniently manage to interpret that one in a much loser sense than the others, right? So much for the champions of freedom. The logic reminds me of the people who walk out in the middle of the street and claim that if they get hit, it's the drivers fault. What good is recourse if you are dead? Well, you guys lose. If you choose to not defend yourselves that's your problem, but I'm glad I at least have a personal choice, as much as you'd like to take it away.