Monday, March 2, 2009

A Leadership Quiz Essay Question

Posted by Jeff Woods on Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:31 AM

Compare and/or Contrast: Demonstrate similarities or dissimilarities between these two political events of the past week: (1) President Obama is defending his $3.6 trillion budget plan to tax rich people and polluters to pay for big investments in expanded health care, cleaner energy and education. Obama: "I know they're gearing up for a fight as we speak. My message to them is this: So am I." (2) Gov. Phil Bredesen is thinking about rejecting millions of dollars in federal stimulus money rather than expand benefits for laid-off workers in ways that many other states did a long time ago. Bredesen: "We have an unemployment fund which is not in good shape right now. We're in the position of going back to our Legislature this year for changes in our tax structure just to keep our fund whole, and taking it to a new level may be too much of a lift for the Legislature this spring." Bonus Point Questions: Which style of leadership is best? Why? Describe the factors you think determine why Bredesen is such a big wuss. Discuss.

Comments (1)

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Bredesen is exhibiting fine leadership here. The unemployment stimulus money is a very bad part of the stimulus package, and to put it into the category of "changes that were made by many other states a long time ago," makes it sound simple and casual. Yes, and those states are famously not "employer friendly" states, and they have the highest employer taxes anywhere. They pay huge weekly benefit amounts, give unemployment to large numbers of marginally eligible people and employers do not open new businesses there for that reason. They also have huge state income taxes, and lots more state revenue to pay for and support these programs.With the stimulus package money, certain congressmen decided we in Tennessee should do as they do, right now, or we can't have any unemployment stimulus money.
The trouble is, we are not set up to do this stuff, it would take an awful lot of time, work, staff and money to make these changes, (at a time when the state system is overwhelmed by the newly unemployed anyhow, and the state is about to lay off state employees) it would not benefit those already unemployed and drawing benefits at all, and what's more, Tennessee legislators are so stingy with funds, so unwilling to give anybody anything, that they may very well refuse to provide the necessary tax increases to keep the trust fund solvent and pay unemployment in the state at all. After all, these are the "bluest" legislators we've ever had, folks. Bredesen is fighting smart, to keep the state government systems in Tennessee working at all.
I suspect he'll figure out which of these new requirments will be the most reasonable and the least destructive to the state's currrent system and try to get them in place and take the money untimately.

report   
Posted by commentator on 03/02/2009 at 7:13 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation