Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Open Revolt in House Democratic Caucus: Odom on the Hot Seat for Bashing Naifeh

Posted by Jeff Woods on Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:39 AM

click to enlarge oie_Gary_Odom_282_29.jpg
House Democrats are outraged and whispering about a possible coup d'état against their leader, Gary Odom, over the unflattering remarks he made to a reporter about Jimmy Naifeh in Memphis last week. "Who's next?" asks one lawmaker, who wouldn't let Pith use his name. "What happens if I cross Gary next? Will it be my turn in the barrel next?" Rep. Charles Curtiss was willing to go on the record with his criticism of Odom. "It bothers me," he says. "Anytime we're publicly attacking one another, we're scattering instead of gathering. If we have issues with one another, we need to keep it out of the press if we can." To the Memphis Flyer's Jackson Baker, Odom blamed Naifeh for the Democrats' demise in Tennessee. Stamping out Naifeh was one of Odom's motivations for giving Williams the speaker's gavel, Odom said. Naifeh was killing the Democratic Party, said Odom, who also acknowledged he would have challenged Naifeh for the speakership himself if Democrats hadn't lost the House in November's elections. "He was the one always pushing the income tax," Odom said, "and that was the single greatest reason for the Democrats' decline in Tennessee over the last few years. It was why Al Gore lost the state in 2000, and it was why we kept losing seats after that, until finally we were in the minority." Says Curtiss: "It concerns me that this is coming out in the press like it is. There's nothing to be gained by it and everything to be lost. It makes no sense." Curtiss says Odom is denying that he said what he was quoted as saying. "Right now, we're hoping that Mr. Odom will go back and try to make amends. He claims he was misquoted by the media. It'll be interesting to see if they had one of those puppies out when he made his misquote," Curtiss says, pointing at Pith's nifty little tape recorder. Some Democrats are so upset they're talking about trying to cast out Odom as leader. But as Kent Whitehouse pointed out yesterday in his own article on the unrest, there's no recall provision in the caucus bylaws, so unseating Odom would take a two-thirds majority vote to change the rules. "That'd be pretty hard to pull off I think," Curtiss admits. "But there could be a move to unseat him if this continues." Another Democrat says, "Rest assured my friend. This will be corrected." Pith has asked to speak with Odom but, as usual, he won't talk to us.

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Odom says: ""He was the one always pushing the income tax," Odom said, "and that was the single greatest reason for the Democrats' decline in Tennessee over the last few years. It was why Al Gore lost the state in 2000, and it was why we kept losing seats after that, until finally we were in the minority."
Um. First of all the income tax was constructed and pushed by the Republican Governor Don Sundquist.
Second, the income tax fight was AFTER the 2000 election and had nothing to do with Al Gore losing the state. It actually happened in 2001 and I remember the Democrats being horrified they were going to lose everything in the '02 elections because of it. Turned out the only Democrat who lost his seat based on that issue was Bob Rochelle. Other incumbents lost seats over the income tax fight, but they were all Republicans in the primary.
Good lord, Gary Odom. Your recollection (and interpretation) of events leaves something to be desired.

report   
Posted by spaz on February 25, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Spaz is absolutely correct. It was on the ballot in 2002, and the fallout was just beginning to settle when I moved back here in early 2003.

report   
Posted by UnionStreet on February 25, 2009 at 1:08 PM

The income tax failed in the state house May 22, 2002. Horns were honked, rocks were thrown. The vote was 49-45 against. At that point there were 58 democrats in the house. 6 months later there were 54. I guess Chip Forrester somehow is responsible for that as well.

report   
Posted by Bredesen's combover on February 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I'm not defending Odom or his interpretation of events, but actually, Spaz, the income tax fight started in 1999. For the record, Rochelle did not run for re-election. Granted, he probably did so because of the income tax.

report   
Posted by Milton on February 25, 2009 at 1:18 PM

If I remember correctly, Forrester passed his pro-income tax resolution through the Tennessee Democrat Party executive committee in 1999.

report   
Posted by Milton on February 25, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Forget the income tax. Let's hold open wealthy tax loopholes for my friends Bill Freeman and Waller Lansden while public schools, health care and the general state revenue picture are all going down the shitter. What does Chip Forrester have to say about this wealthy tax loophole? Is he willing to buck his treasurer/Republican donor on this?

report   
Posted by Odom's purple toupee on February 25, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Pinkston:
Suck it.
Love,
Gary

report   
Posted by The Leader on February 25, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Odom,
Swallow it.
Love,
The House Democratic Caucus

report   
Posted by Charlie Curtiss on February 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Phillips (43)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (20)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation