Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Historians: George W. Not the Worst President Ever

Posted by Pete Kotz on Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:21 AM

click to enlarge george-bush-sour.jpg
It appears that George W. Bush is not the worst president ever. A survey of historians by C-SPAN indicates there were at least five guys worse than him. We can all breathe a sigh of relief.

While Abe Lincoln is considered the best, Bush came in 36th -- ahead of James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Franklin Pierce, William Henry Harrison and Warren G. Harding. But as C-SPAN is quick to note, the rankings tend to shift over the years as present-day concerns change the way our leaders are perceived.

At least Bush's improved his ranking from a few weeks ago, when Pith's resident presidential scholar Matt Sullivan had him tied for fifth worst of all time.


Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

It's kind of crazy to rank W.H. Harrison as one of the worst, seeing as how he was president for less than two months. His biggest policy mistake was not wearing a warm coat on inauguration day, which kind of pales beside the invasion of Iraq.

report   
Posted by BoydBBiggs on February 17, 2009 at 8:55 AM

I am definitely not a fan of Bush, but as a historian I have to say that this "worst in history" question that is regularly trotted out in the media blurs an essential line between current events and history. Any "historian" who claims to know where Bush ranks historically is bullshitting you. Historians need temporal perspective (usually at least 50 years but not always) to truly judge the significance of past events and people, Bush's reign is still too new to be judged this way.

report   
Posted by David on February 17, 2009 at 1:42 PM

To anyone 50 or 100 years from now who tries to make a claim George W. Bush wasn't a walking disaster as president, I would say this (if I could): Bullshit. You didn't have the misfortune of living through it. I did. Don't tell me it wasn't so bad, sonny. I know better. I was there.
And regardless of the state of Iraq in the future, the lies that preceded the invasion will be the same lies they were then. Passage of time will not alter that.

report   
Posted by Marvin on February 17, 2009 at 5:18 PM

I hear you, Marvin. It's hard to imagine anyone being worse. But I think the point David's making is that the standards of judgment change over time. I can imagine almost everyone in 1974 believed Nixon was the worst president of all-time. But compare him to Bush, and we'd probably both take Nixon in a heartbeat today. Besides, another 50 years gives us a lot of opportunities to elect more creeps, sociopaths, and half-wit trust funders.

report   
Posted by Pete Kotz on February 18, 2009 at 12:50 AM

In retrospect, I'd reconsider ranking Bush 43 over Millard Fillmore and put Andrew Johnson closer to the bottom. Tennessee doesn't have a great track record with presidents.

report   
Posted by Matt S. on February 18, 2009 at 1:02 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (61)


Phillips (42)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (19)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation