Monday, December 15, 2008

National Media Auto Bailout Coverage: Put a Corker in It

Posted by Jack Silverman on Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:59 AM

Keith Olbermann and Newsweek senior editor Daniel Gross pay homage to our junior senator from Tennessee There's a good chance Bob Corker's national name recognition quadrupled this weekend, after his prominent role as a Republican point man in the auto bailout hearings and negotiations landed him some prime national media real estate. Yesterday, Corker appeared on Face the Nation along with Sens. Carl Levin and Sherrod Brown. On Friday, he was featured in a New York Times piece spotlighting the Tennessee junior senator's face-off with U.A.W. president Ron Gettelfinger. In the last few days, he also appeared on CNBC and Fox News, and was the subject of some less than flattering commentary from Keith Olbermann and Newsweek senior editor Daniel Gross on Olbermann's Countdown show on MSNBC (see above). And all of this on top of the Wall Street Journal's deification of Corker, which was discussed here on Pith last week. The media feeding frenzy followed Corker's rival Republican plan to the Democratic auto bailout proposal. Among other things, Corker claims that U.A.W. worker wages have to be lowered to be competitive with the Japanese automakers, and that lawmakers should be able to dictate how much a U.A.W. worker can make. No one's suggesting that autoworkers are underpaid, or that the U.A.W. has always been a reasonable and noble organization. Still, it seems absurd to single out wages for autoworkers while making no similar demands on the grossly overpaid execs at the top. And employee wages seem to be pretty far down the list of reasons for U.S. automakers' lack of competitiveness, well below factors such as terrible management, insistence on putting out gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs and a complete blindness to the needs and desires of the marketplace. It's not unreasonable to suggest that U.A.W. workers will have to take pay cuts. But for a senator from Tennessee, home to Nissan's North American headquarters as well as a new Volkswagen plant, to suggest that lawmakers should be able to dictate U.A.W. worker compensation, seems a little squirrelly to say the least. To the skeptical mind, it might seem like Corker's real plan is to make sure the U.A.W. has no bargaining power when it comes to unionizing workers at Nissan and Volkswagen in Tennessee. Fortunately, our politicians rarely give us reasons to be cynical, so we can assume Corker's plan is inspired by the noblest intentions. And even if you don't agree with his plan or his politics, as far as his role as an ambassador for Tennessee, he's a hell of a lot less embarrassing than Marsha Blackburn, right? Last but not least, what do you make of this?

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

other than the inflated executive salaries, pretty much any criticism of the big 3's current woes can be attributed to the UAW. and i don't mean the way you can attribute the fall of communism with john lennon's haircut. i challenge you to find one single unbiased person that works in the auto industry, from 2nd and 3rd tier supplier through to the assembly line floor, that would say otherwise. unions have turned over the years from the antidote into the poison, from education to service to manufacturing. i have yet to hear a reasonable or even coherent argument otherwise.

report   
Posted by cope on December 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM

"to suggest that lawmakers should be able to dictate U.A.W. worker compensation, seems a little squirrelly to say the least."
Ah, not if they are taking 25-20 billion public dollars. It's called oversight. Ever heard of it?

report   
Posted by Taterman on December 16, 2008 at 4:01 PM

Taterman, but why U.A.W. workers and not upper level management, where the salaries are far more ridiculous?

report   
Posted by Jack on December 16, 2008 at 5:00 PM

I am not at all convinced that simply handing money over to these companies will convince the American people to buy more of their cars. We need to see a decisive change to a better product at a better cost. If taxpayer dollars are received with looser conditions than the Senate republicans asked for – OR – a pre-packaged bankruptcy, I’ll never buy a car from the Beg 3 and United Auto Whiners again – period .
And I really don't understand Middlefinger's argument that Senate Republicans are protecting foreign automakers by asking for a definite date for pay parity with auto workers of foreign brands. How would it help a foreign company if a US automaker is more viable or competitive? Pardon me, but that had to be the most stupid argument he has made yet.
The UAW's Middlefinger said the failure of the legislation showed that Congress should stay "away from the bargaining table."
When Mr. Middlefinger is asking for taxpayer dollars, he is inviting congress to the table and the rest of us - the great unwashed that don't carry an elite UAW Membership Card.

report   
Posted by Harry Callahan on December 16, 2008 at 10:15 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (61)


Phillips (42)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (19)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation