Friday, October 24, 2008

A Defense of Sarah Palin's $150,000 Shopping Spree

Posted by Pete Kotz on Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:16 PM

click to enlarge sarah_20palin_20vogue_20magazine.jpg
This high-minded missive just in from Scene book editor and fashion correspondent Margaret Renkl: After Politico got busy this week with a serious investigative piece about the cost of Sarah Palin’s wardrobe, the blowhards actually had the grace to feel a little sheepish. Report that the U.S. has blown up an Afghan village and killed 60 little kids, and all you’ll get from the war machine is some blather about Taliban hiding places and collateral damage. But get busted for dressing your high-profile hockey mom in some to-die-for Manolo Blahniks, and egg starts dripping down the fat jowls and chin of even the worst wingnut. It’s not like Joe Six Pack has any shot at all of keeping this woman in the manner to which she has evidently grown accustomed, and didn’t they pick her just for Joe? Oh, please, what’s the surprise? As any little girl in this country knows, you can pair up your Caribou Barbie with your G.I. Joe and send them out on the town together, and no one cares that Joe is wearing ugly clothes and muddy boots because no one’s looking at Joe anyway. But Barbie better be wearing a really cute outfit, and a different one every single day, or pretty soon the press pool’s going to be taking bets on which sensible pantsuit will show up in the rotation on Tuesday. Have you seen the pictures of Palin in her pre-personal-shopping days? Sure, it’s wasteful. In any meaningful context it’s wasteful—according to my Heifer International catalog, you can send a milk cow to 300 hungry Afghan families for $150,000—and it’s both wasteful and stupid for a political campaign that’s being outspent 20 to 1 on ad buys in Indiana alone. But it still makes sense. John McCain went shopping in a toy store for his vice president, so it shouldn’t be surprising that he bought the entire made-to-fit wardrobe on the same aisle. What use would she be without it?

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Well, damned if you do and damned if you don't. I can just imagine the media types going after her if she showed up for the debate in her GAP clothes with her Land's End boots. Have any idea what Obama or McCain pays for a suit or even a tie? Yes it is a lot of money for clothes, but so is $3,000,000.00 to be spent on a few TV spots this month by the DNC. How much food or healthcare would that buy? Do you think any of the money raised by the DNC, or the RNC for that matter, from the celebs with a cause will be spent to buy any cows?

report   
Posted by Maggie on 10/24/2008 at 5:25 PM

Don't you think that using large amounts of money to further your campaign is a little different than using it to create a falsehood? Yes both parties use ridiculous amounts of money, but isn't the point that Palin has claimed to be your everyday gal? Your everyday gal clothed in the finest garments money can buy.

report   
Posted by ddt the sanitation worker on 10/27/2008 at 1:49 PM

You're both right--The Republicans are phonies (gasp!), and you could fund a shitload of social justice with the millions that have been poured into the Obama campaign. But Margaret makes the really important point in her first paragraph: This whole debate is a stupid distraction--or should I say a brilliant misdirection? As far as I'm concerned, everybody in the race could have a few billion to stock their closets if they'd all promise to quit slaughtering people in our name.

report   
Posted by Maria B. on 10/27/2008 at 5:06 PM

just remember, sarah palin is attacked by every major network except Fox, 90% of every newspaper, 95% of every university in this country, Public radio, public schools and TV, but the average citizen is too stupid to understand or comprehend this. Yet sarah palin survives and is in the game. This must drive the left crazy knowing they control the airways and she still is viable.

report   
Posted by martin on 03/17/2009 at 9:17 AM

This is alot to do about nothing. How much did either Clinton's spend on clothes? How much did Obama and Michelle spend on their and their children's clothes? How much did Biden spend on clothes? this is so stupid!! Get over it!!!

report   
Posted by kansasgal on 03/25/2009 at 5:43 PM

Sarah Palin could wear a sack and look better than ANY of you creeps!! She is one fine lady.

report   
Posted by john oakman on 04/19/2009 at 1:59 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (64)


Legislature (59)


Phillips (41)


Sports (16)


Media (14)


Law and Order (13)


Around Town (9)


Crazy Crap (7)


Breaking News (7)


Education (6)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation