Friday, August 1, 2008

Why Is the Chamber Playing Possum with May Town?

Posted by Matt Pulle on Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:31 AM

click to enlarge possum.jpg
Earlier this year, developer Tony Giarratana unveiled plans for the May Town Center to a pro-biz crowd who gushed and swayed like love-struck school girls at a Maroon 5 concert. Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Ralph Schultz may as well have waved a lighter (or a cell phone) as the developer began to wind down his talk. Later, a giddy Schulz would describe his reaction to the proposed $4 billion development as “excited, enthusiastic, ecstatic.” But like many teen romances, the biz pigs’ crush on Giarratana wilted when spring turned to summer. Last week, when the developer needed them to have his back, the Chamber cut and run. At last week’s debate before the Metro Planning Commission, the group's usual point men were AWOL. Giarratana’s only supporters were slick developer and PR-whores, most of whom stood to gain financially from the project. Of course, it would be one thing if the Chamber were merely taking the Karl Dean Tact and doing nothing. But as this Tennessean story noted, the group’s powerful PR firm, McNeely Pigott & Fox, is actually working on behalf of the neighbor’s who oppose May Town. Meanwhile, Keel Hunt, the former Chamber honcho and spokesman for Martha Ingram, is a part of the neighbor’s all-star cast of lobbyists and organizers. That all indicates that, behind the scenes, the biz pigs are trying to off this thing without spilling any blood. So why is the Chamber playing Switzerland? I’m hearing different theories, which may or may not be correct. But I'm feeling very City-Paperish today. So let's do some speculating, even though I may not know what I'm talking about. Theory 1: The Chamber, for once, is trying to protect downtown and thinks -- appropriately so -- that May Town will drive a knife through the heart of the city’s ever-transitional business district. We know downtown has a glut of office space. Why would Nashville's preeminent business group push for something that would only make that problem worse? Theory 2: The Chamber could give a shit about downtown; its members care more about safeguarding Cool Springs. It is the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce, after all. I like this theory the most. It's funny. And true? Theory 3: Those Chamber folks are smarter than we think. They don’t want to follow the lead of Atlanta, which avidly encouraged development outside the downtown core to the city’s near ruin. They’re hip to modern sensibilities on how to grow a city in the era of high gas prices. (Infill, Infill, Infill.) And they realize that May Town is a rather antiquated idea. Does anyone buy the theory that the Chamber is that smart? Theory 4: They simply don’t trust Tony G. If Pith can give Giarratana a nickname, it would be Too Tall Tony. The guy has built some stylish high rises, but he has a habit of promising more than he can deliver. (See Tower, Signature.) Our biz pigs don't like that "all hat and no cattle" persona. It makes them look in the mirror. Theory 5: They simply don’t trust Jack May. People who first meet May, who owns the land where the development would be built, say that he’s a downright unpleasant fellow. And although he’s filthy rich, he typically ducks out of charity functions, which is a worse sin in Nashville society than belonging to a segregated country club. Also, the word is that May spends most of his time in Mexico. That would make him an absentee landlord to the 1000th degree. The Chamber doesn’t want to go to mobilize its infantry for a man in exile. Theory 6: They don’t want to get mired in another divisive public debate. Already the Chamber has been castigated for being the driving force behind the school board’s reseg plan. Now that many think either the mayor or a new board will come up with a new plan that both white and black people like, the Chamber may wind up suffering a very public humiliation. Of course, the pigs should be used to that by now. This is the same group that so avidly supported Pedro. How did that work out again...?

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

So glad it's Friday and you can say what you're really thinking.

report   
Posted by pedestrian on August 1, 2008 at 7:37 AM

Office Vacancy in the CBD is 10.7% - the same as the Nashville Market average and lower (gasp) than Cool Springs (11.3%).
Pulle - fact checking, you should try it.

report   
Posted by Anon on August 1, 2008 at 9:35 AM

Is that before--or after--Nissan ditched for Cool Springs?

report   
Posted by MattP on August 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Last I saw, the vacancy rate was around 20% for the central core. Half of the ATT building is now vacant. That's probably 5% alone.

report   
Posted by judicious1 on August 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM

Data provided was from Q2 08. Can you link to a more recent source?

report   
Posted by Anon on August 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM

What areas are included in the CBD? Vanderbilt? Midtown? West End?

report   
Posted by MattP on August 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Hey Anon, the 10.7% vacancy doesn't include Nissan leaving or the pending opening of the Pinnacle Tower. A conservative estimate is that at least 1 million square feet of office space will be vacant in the CBD in the next year. Want a source? Check out Chas Sisk's article in the May 19th issue of The Tennessean.

report   
Posted by Source on August 1, 2008 at 10:53 AM

Anon ... or come out to a planning commission meeting some time and listen to the stats fly. 20+% when pinnacle comes online.

report   
Posted by RickB on August 1, 2008 at 1:25 PM

Actually, I think the advocates of MTC have a legitimate point when they contend that Nashville needs an alternative to downtown, because a lot of businesses prefer a campus; I doubt that high gas prices are going to change that very much. The bigger problem with MTC is that the promoters are making extravagant promises with only a hypothetical likelihood of delivery. An even bigger problem is that they haven't thought the thing through. They promote it as "New Urbanism," when it would seem to me that a basic requirement of a new urbanist development of the intended scale would be a light-rail link to downtown. If forty thousand people are going to work there, it'll need infrastructure, and one bridge won't do it. I suspect the Chamber types have thought this thing through, and realize that the *concept*, not just the promoters, is all hat and no cattle.
More deeply [and to take up the City Paper's challenge to think through the developmental goals of the city], just what sort of economic role do we see Nashville as playing? The unquestioned premise of these discussions is that "economic development" consists of enticing outsiders to locate operations here. But such "footloose industries" have historically proven fickle; ask any small Tennessee town whose cut-and-sew operation has decamped to Central America over the weekend--or, for that matter, the geniuses who lured Magnetek to downtown. This ain't how Silicon Valley does it; there they create their own businesses, and the world goes there to be where the action is. I can think of two industries like that here--health care and [especially] music. Health care might use MTC [Those firms avoid DT like the plague], but music wouldn't; those people have the Row. Any others? Again, I think the key is making Nashville a magnet for creative people eager for opportunity; the approach of MTC just looks like a higher form of smokestack-chasing.

report   
Posted by David Carlton on August 1, 2008 at 8:19 PM

The Central Business District (CBD) and
MetroCenter both posted modest positive absorption, although completion of The
Terrazo, currently 33 percent pre-leased, and the relocation of Nissan North America
to its new headquarters will add approximately 330,000 square feet of vacant office
space to the CBD by the end of the year.
Excerpt from 2Q results:
http://www.centenn.com/o-08q2-Nashville.pdf
The source: Bi-annually, Grubb & Ellis|Centennial publishes a comprehensive report, the Nashville Office Market Survey. This report includes data and text covering basic market conditions such as inventory, vacancy, absorption, rents, and new and planned construction, as well as economic background analysis.

report   
Posted by Jeremy Heidt on August 2, 2008 at 2:59 AM

". . . completion of The
Terrazo, currently 33 percent pre-leased, and the relocation of Nissan North America
to its new headquarters will add approximately 330,000 square feet of vacant office
space to the CBD by the end of the year."
Er, the Terrazzo is a residential tower.

report   
Posted by David Carlton on August 4, 2008 at 9:04 PM

The Terrazzo's website notes 75,000 square feet of office space. It's pre-leasing and ultimate occupancy rate might give a feel for how office space outside of the core downtown area, especially combined with residential on-site, is accepted in the near future. Much smaller scale than MTC of course, but the Gulch could still be a bellweather. Doesn't even need a new bridge.

report   
Posted by tgrtnt on August 4, 2008 at 9:44 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Pith in the Wind

Politics (61)


Phillips (42)


Legislature (27)


Arts and Entertainment (19)


Film (19)


Sports (18)


Law and Order (14)


Media (13)


Red State Update (9)


Education (8)


All contents © 1995-2012 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation