In addition to the practical political benefits, such a plan is also a chance to show America that we are a modern political party focused on results. It’s a chance to show that when confronted with an unexpected problem, we have the common sense to come together, roll up our sleeves and direct events to a successful conclusion.That's one possibility. Here's another, probably more likely result: The superdelegates would come off like cigar-chomping, backroom-dealing pols and do more harm than good to the nominee. What's wrong with saving a little drama for Denver? TV ratings would soar. An aside: In a Wall Street Journal article today, Bredesen, who is uncommitted as a superdelegate, said he thinks the controversy over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright is hurting Obama, which might mean the governor is leaning toward Clinton. Here's what he said:
The superdelegates attempt to look at electability, and there is still a lot of water to go over the dam on that subject before most of them have to commit" at the convention. "Among the rank-and-file, persuadable middle of the road, I think the guy is a problem for Sen. Obama. It kind of reminds people of some of the wars in the past.UPDATE: Krumm's take on Phil the Chill's idea. UPDATE: We were wrong to say Clinton and Obama are against Bredesen's superdelegate convention. The governor says Clinton "certainly wasn't repelled by the idea" when he talked to her. And Obama is talking like he's for it.
Showing 1-1 of 1