One pastime of mine is watching how hardcore grassroots-y Tennessee Republican types try to tar Phil Bredesen, a man who is about as Republican as a person running under the Democratic banner can get without getting excommunicated from the party. Really, if it weren't for the "D" next to his name, I suspect that most of these folks would be embracing him, or, at least, they wouldn't be as comically hostile to the guy.
There was, for instance, the drastic-cuts-to-TennCare episode of a few years ago. A number of self-styled Republican conservative types were up in arms about this. They were outraged about these cuts, and for some reason expected everyone else to be outraged, too, never mind that they had been beating the drum about how grossly expansive (and expensive) TennCare had become in the years preceding. Last I checked, Republicans generally liked cutting government programs (certain
current presidential administrations excluded).
And let's not forget the Great
Christmas Card Controversy of 2006, which was so phenomenally stupid I refuse to discuss it further (if you want details or a refresher, start
here.
And now we have
the "coolie" controversy. Now, this one has some merit to it, on its face anyway. In a dispatch from the trade meeting in China, Bredesen wrote the following:
\\The scale, the energy, the focus of this place is astonishing. I've thought of China as a giant, poor third world country (remember those Chinese coolies who built the railroads?) now charging onto the industrial stage for the first time.\\
Hmm, "coolie...." Well, yes, in many circumstances that term can be considered offensive, so it's worth looking at the context, which, in this case, absolves the governor, who is pretty clearly using the word in its historical context to make a larger—and complimentary—point. Now, if I were advising the governor, I would have told him to change the word just to avoid this kind of nonsense, but I'm not, so I didn't. Anyway, one of the more refreshing things about the governor is his sometimes-not-very-well-hidden distaste for the niceties of everyday politics. He's a policy guy, not a political guy. Which, to my mind, is to his credit.
Here are three things that are especially chapping my ass: