http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2012/05/24/having-babies-because-youre-poor Comments On: Having Babies Because You're Poor by Betsy Phillips en-us Copyright 2013 Nashville Scene. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Nashville Scene readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Nashville Scene. wil@desert.net (Nashville Scene Webmaster) Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500 Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 -0500 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by Jon Osterholm]]> Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:40:15 -0600 Nashville Scene http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/chronic…
Posted by AnglRdr]]> Thu, 31 May 2012 19:32:43 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Janet Cook Sanchez]]> Mon, 28 May 2012 22:48:21 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by BattleCat]]> Mon, 28 May 2012 00:22:51 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Min]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 20:24:16 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by xray]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 19:48:15 -0500 Nashville Scene
But certainly young people are less capable of making intelligent decisions like whether and how to use birth control that their parents who are too stupid to choose between health care options or to invest their retirement funds on their own.

I could see one argue the reverse, that adults are better able to make such decisions than their children.
Posted by Mark Rogers]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 19:43:34 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Min]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 17:31:09 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Pete Wilson]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 11:27:50 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by xray]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 10:55:35 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by BattleCat]]> Sat, 26 May 2012 01:55:38 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Perry Aubric]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 23:04:52 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by xray]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 20:03:51 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by BattleCat]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 19:03:30 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by BattleCat]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 16:57:12 -0500 Nashville Scene
I do note that apparently Mr. Hatchett finds willing partners who either know his history (and are interested nevertheless, which is their business) or don't (and thus are consciously taking a risk).
Posted by Pete Wilson]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 16:03:34 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Pete Wilson]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:56:58 -0500 Nashville Scene
That is...what's the word I'm looking for?...oh, yeah....

That's a lie. No, I'm sorry.
Posted by Perry Aubric]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:53:26 -0500 Nashville Scene
Since I support individual choice, I for one would vigorously oppose forcing anyone to get sterilized (i.e., a form of eugenics), to get an abortion, to do without contraception, or to carry an unwanted pregnancy to full term.
Posted by Perry Aubric]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:49:55 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by xray]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:49:06 -0500 Nashville Scene
In an age of reversible vasectomies, why is it unreasonable to limit Mr. Hatchett's procreation until he can pay adequate child support to each of his children?

If abstinence will not work and young people are not reliable users of birth control, why is it unreasonable to prevent immature youth from having children that they cannot raise?

Every time I see an argument in favor of privatizing Social Security, I see liberals make the case that too many Americans are unqualified to make intelligent financial decisions.
Posted by Mark Rogers]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 15:28:37 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Pete Wilson]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 14:32:52 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Pete Wilson]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 14:09:00 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by Chris Allen]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 13:08:45 -0500 Nashville Scene Posted by xray]]> Fri, 25 May 2012 12:56:26 -0500 Nashville Scene