Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News: Pith in the Wind

Re: “The Daily Links: Pizza Barons, Dive Bars, and Late Shows

Re: Blue Lives Matter. Has anyone else noticed the irony: the two cops killed by a minority member in NY were minorities...even though everything is Whitey's fault?

4 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by yoyo moi on 12/22/2014 at 6:20 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

"So, why should you spend money to see a movie you don't want to see in the first place just because North Korea doesn't want you to?"

Betsy, that's exactly why I want to see THE INTERVIEW as soon as possible. I wasn't planning to see it, but after North Korea attacked it and Sony caved in (after the nation's five biggest theater chains announced they would not show it), I definitely intend to see it.

As a Belcourt spokesman said, it no longer matters whether the movie is good or bad. Showing it is what matters.

Also, keep in mind that free speech/First Amendment/what-have-you is never about protecting Thomas Jefferson. It's about protecting flag burners and people who say and do stupid things. It's about protecting lowbrow vulgarians like Larry Flynt and Seth Rogen. Or would you be more comfortable in a world where Kim Jong-Un is America's minister of culture?

Oops, I forgot. We're already living with that world.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mark on 12/22/2014 at 6:18 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

excellent idea, Mark.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Doyle on 12/22/2014 at 6:09 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

If Belcourt can't get THE INTERVIEW, maybe they can show Chaplin's THE GREAT DICTATOR and other movies lampooning dictatorships: NINOTCHKA, TO BE OR NOT TO BE (1942 version, please) and the Three Stooges shorts "You Nazty Spy" and "I'll Never Heil Again."

It would remind people there was a time when Hollywood wasn't afraid to portray dictators (and their followers) as bumbling buffoons.

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Mark on 12/22/2014 at 6:07 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

infowars link, infamous website full of stupid conspiracy theories and very ill reputable advertisers, posted by yoyo, another crazy psychopath, and full of shit sub human being

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Marduk-Panzer-Division on 12/22/2014 at 5:47 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

Jay Sekulow...this crooked lawyer is the one hired by the cuckos to be in charge, of the aforementioned lawsuit

5 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Marduk-Panzer-Division on 12/22/2014 at 5:43 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

yep Obama's pretty incompetent of late, setting the whole agenda for the 2016 election...

our own wonderful art house The Belcourt is offering a screen to "The Interview" if Sony decides to release it: http://wkrn.com/2014/12/22/nashvilles-belc…

and here's the open letter to Sony that The Belcourt signed onto, from a coalition of independent theatres, of which The Belcourt is a founding member:
http://www.arthouseconvergence.org/an-open…

4 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Doyle on 12/22/2014 at 5:31 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

Obama doesn't need any negative comments from the Tea Party to point out his incompetence. He makes his own case indisputably.

2 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by davidlongfellow on 12/22/2014 at 5:23 PM

Re: “Tennessee Lawmakers Defend Cockfighting

"equal rights", I think it's time to loosen your tin foil hat a little. It's cutting off the circulation to your brain.

Posted by Whew! on 12/22/2014 at 4:56 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

Executive Orders (like the Emancipation Proclamation) have no need of being in conjunction with congress. hence the term, Executive Order! They are usually issued when congress in unavailable, uncooperative, or there is lack of time for political niceties. Congress, to the chagrin of many ignorant teahadist Obama haters, is simply one cog in a 3 spoke wheel. No more the master than any of the other 3, once again to the chagrin of the many ignorant teahadist Obama haters!!

11 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Jim Collins on 12/22/2014 at 4:55 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

Ah, Dave.

So many words, so little thought.

11 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Dave Makes yoyo Sound Sane on 12/22/2014 at 4:52 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

All the previews I saw made me think it was going to be dreadful. Just like anything and everything with Seth Rogen in it. I had no plans to see it. Well, I didn't until this came up.

But the President is right. We shouldn't let some batshit crazy dough-ball of a tin pot dictator have the ability to decide what we can and cannot see in a movie theatre. And there is actually some merit in the Republican encouragement for people to go see it as a defiance of that little turd and his shithole country. I think that idea is OK.

Apparently, as we speak, the President's promise of retaliation is underway. I say, unleash the nerds of America and let them have their way with North Korea.

It would appear that the Republicans and the President are actually on the same page here. But, never fear, we'll hear soon enough from the teabaggers why they are not. And why Obama is to blame for the 1950s ceasefire that left communists in power in North Korea. And why Obama lets those people eat dogs. All his fault. And, if that's not enough reason to hate him, well, he's black.

8 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Perry Aubric on 12/22/2014 at 4:35 PM

Re: “Tennessee Lawmakers Defend Cockfighting

CITIES AND COUNTIES CANNOT VIOLATE RACKETEERING LAWS
Title 18 section 1951 Interference with Commerce: “Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity…by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires to do so…shall be fined…or imprisoned not more than twenty years…(2) the term ‘extortion’ means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” Title 7, section 2 [Agricultural commodities] Definitions: “The word ‘person’…shall include individuals, associations, partnerships, corporations, and trusts. The word ‘commodity’ shall mean wheat, cotton, rice, corn, oats, barley, rye, flaxseed, grain sorghums, mill feeds, butter, eggs,…[Irish potatoes], wool, wool tops, fats and oils…cottonseed meal, cottonseed, peanuts, soybeans, soybean meal, livestock, livestock products, and frozen concentrated orange juice, and all other goods and articles…” Title 7 section 2131 “The Congress finds that animals and activities which are regulated under this chapter are either in interstate or foreign commerce or substantially affect such commerce or the free flow thereof, and that regulation of animals and activities as provided in this chapter is necessary to prevent and eliminate burdens upon such commerce and to effectively regulate such commerce, in order…(3) to protect the owners of animals from theft of their animals by preventing the sale or use of animals which have been stolen.” Title 18 section 1962. Prohibited activities: (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce…(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.” Title 18 Stolen Property, section 2311 Definitions: “As used in this chapter…’livestock’ means any domestic animals raised for home use, consumption, or profit, such as horses, pigs, llamas, goats, fowl, sheep, buffalo, and cattle, or the carcasses thereof.” Title 7 Agriculture section 601: No state can restrict the raising of any commodity (chicken - hen or cock, other poultry, cattle, horse, goat, pig, sheep, parakeet, frog, fish, chinchilla, guinea pig, rabbit, etc.) for personal use. If the state is forbidden to restrict commodities, neither can the city or county. City or county employees get 20 years in prison for conspiring to restrict the free flow of commerce and agricultural commodities known as “chickens (roosters and hens),” “birds and poultry,” cattle,” “crowing fowl,” “pigeons,” “goats,” “horses,” “pigs,” “sheep,” “other small farm animals (rabbits, fish, chinchillas, frogs, parakeets, guinea pigs, etc.),” and “animal/livestock feed” consisting of mill feeds: rice, corn, oats, barley, rye, flaxseed, and grain sorghums. The penalty is 20 years’ imprisonment or $250,000 fine.

Salinas v. United States, 118 S.Ct. 469 (1997) “[I]nterprative canon is not license for judiciary to rewrite language enacted by legislature. . . Predominant elements in substantive Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations are: (1) conduct (2) of enterprise (3) through pattern of racketeering activity. 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). . . . Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) conspiracy conviction does not require overt or specific act. 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). . . . If conspirators have plan which calls for some conspirators to perpetrate crime and others to provide support, supporters are as guilty as perpetrators. . . . Conspiracy may exist and be punished whether or not substantive crime ensues, for conspiracy is distinct evil, dangerous to public, and so punishable in itself.” Judges and cities are forbidden to rewrite language enacted by legislature. They are forbidden to even think about using the courts to uphold bogus, fabricated charges for “hot pursuit of revenue.” By their “conduct” of falsely representing the character, amount, or legal status of any debt, participants violate 15 U.S.C. sections 1692e(2)(A) and 1681s-2, and became “principals” in a “pattern of racketeering” by putting “false liens or debts” on “court or credit records” without “verifying” that the liens or debts were “legally valid” as the result of “having the matter determined by a jury” prior to having an “abstract of judgment entered.” The fraud continues when these bogus judgments are used for “collection of unlawful debt.” The language of 15 U.S.C. section 1681s-2 is particularly clear: “A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or consciously avoids knowing that the information is inaccurate.”

Amortization: “The World Book Dictionary defines ‘amortize’ as: 1. To set money aside regularly in a special fund for future wiping out of (a debt…); 2. Law. To convey (property) to a body, especially an ecclesiastical body, which does not have the right to sell or give it away.” ‘Amortization’ is: 1. The act of amortizing a debt; 2. The money set aside for this purpose.” The County is liable for cities’ fraudulent misuse of the word “amortization” to mean an 18-month “grace” period before county agents crack down on all livestock and other small farm animal owners, 4-H, and FFA. The correct definition of “amortization” means that the county and cities need to set money aside right now for “conveying property (deeds/bundle of rights/chickens/chicken feed/livestock) to a body, (city or county agents), which does not have the right to sell or give it away. This is hard evidence of County’s liability for fraud – they know they have no right to con citizens into amending their own Deeds by giving up their property, but count on the public being too ignorant to look up the real definition of “amortize.”

CIVIL RICO by DAVID B. SMITH and TERRANCE G. REED, 1999 Edition published by MATTHEW BENDER, publication update September 1999, front page: “Injuries to “Business or Property:” Interpreting the scope of compensable “business or property” injuries under section 1964(c), THE Sixth Circuit recently held in Isaak v. Trumble Savings & Loan Co., 169 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 1999), that the use and enjoyment of real estate constitutes “property” within the meaning of RICO so as to trigger the accrual of a RICO claim.” The county and its cities are liable for racketeering conduct of its employees/agents’ use of fear, threats, and intimidation to “interfere with the use and enjoyment of property” by citizens who pay city and county employees to “protect and serve” their property rights.

California Civil Code section 3482.5 Preexisting Agricultural Uses Not Nuisance. “(a)(1) No agricultural activity, operation, or facility, or appurtenances thereof, conducted or maintained for commercial purposes, and in a manner consistent with proper and accepted customs and standards, as established and followed by similar agricultural operations in the same locality, shall be or become a nuisance, private or public, due to any changed condition in or about the locality, after it has been in operation for more than three years if it was not a nuisance at the time it began.” County is liable for their agents’ “racketeering and extortion” in using threats, fear and intimidation by going door-to-door issuing citations for having too many parakeets, fish, frogs, goats, guinea pigs, fowl, pigeons, pigs, horses, etc., which information they obtained illegally through criminal trespass or violation of property owners’ Fourth Amendment.

U.S. v. Frega, 179 F.3d 793 (9th Cir. 1999) at 793: “To establish conspiracy under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) does not require proof that individual defendant participated personally, or agreed to participate personally, in two predicate offenses; rather, the conspiracy must contemplate the commission of two predicate acts by one or more of its members. 18 U.S.C. section 1962(d).” More than two predicate acts occur when private individuals conspire with public employees to violate state and federal law by restricting property ownership without just compensation in furtherance of a racketeering scheme or artifice (denial of honest government services and theft under color of law); therefore, the County is the municipality upon which the “liability is imposed” for conduct constituting RICO conspiracy through fraud and deceit to effect “takings” without due process and without just compensation, which is theft under color. The county needs to remember the “judicial officers” who went to jail in this Frega case for operating the courts as a racketeering enterprise, the $42 million that went back into Uncle Sam’s Treasury as “fruits of a racketeering enterprise,” and needs to remember the 1,500 crooked employees who used to work for the DMV and who took “bribes” to “do favors” and manufacture fake licenses for their friends. In the Frega case, the feds only collected $42 million, because it was pled improperly, and a lot more big fish escaped the net.

Salinas v. United States, 118 S.Ct. 469 (1997): “[C]onspiracy is a distinct evil, dangerous to the public, and punishable in itself.” City and county employees are liable for conspiring to restrict property (including old cars) and agricultural commodities (Title 7, section 2) without just compensation, and conspiring to target disenfranchised livestock owners and feed mills in violation of Title 42 section 1983, and admitted to having “met” (conspired) with code enforcement and private persons in violation of the Brown Act in order to steal. The county is liable for its employees’ intent (conspiracy) to conduct city and county business as a racketeering enterprise.

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, 87 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1996) at 378: “Attorney need know nothing about client’s ongoing or planned illicit activity for crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege to apply.” The County is liable for city employees’ “planned illicit activity” to turn property ownership into a crime, and any attorney representing the city or county agents in a lawsuit is liable under crime-fraud exception, and their malpractice insurance will not cover RICO allegations; nor can any of their clients recover ANY attorney fees (this notion was rejected by the full House in 1970 see CIVIL RICO, footnote 25)

Crowe v. Henry, 43 F.3d 198, 199 (5th Cir. 1995): “A preanswer Motion to Dismiss action for failure to state a claim admits facts alleged in complaint but challenges plaintiff’s right to relief based upon those facts.” The County would have no hope of using a 12(b)(6) motion to deny the fact that any of its citizens exists, and that one citizen was subjected to Animal Enterprise Terrorism, threats, fear, intimidation, trespass, and robbery by city employees.

Guerrero v. Gates, et al, CV 00-7165, WILLIAM J. REA, August 28, 2000, United States District Court for the Central District of California, quoting pertinent parts relating to nationwide news the LAPD CONDUCT SUBJECT TO CIVIL RICO: DISCUSSION: Legal Standard Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6): A party may bring a motion to dismiss a plaintiff’s claims if the plaintiff’s allegations “fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Generally, “[a] complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957). Thus, dismissal is proper where the complaint lacks either a cognizable legal theory or insufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t., 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). In reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a court must construe all allegations contained in the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and must accept as true all material allegations in the complaint, as well as any reasonable inferences to be drawn from them. See Hospital Bldg. Co. v. Trustees of the Rex Hosp., 425 U.S. 738 (1976). Thus, no matter how improbable the alleged facts are, the court must accept them as true for the purposes of the action. See Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 326-27 (1989). The first amended complaint alleges planting evidence and extortion by Rampart police, which are both racketeering violations under Title 18. Attorneys for the defendant police made a motion to dismiss based on “failure to state a claim.” The court recommended that this motion be denied, and encouraged the plaintiff to pursue his racketeering claims.” Likewise, it would be very easy to “prove the set of facts” that the city and county employees aided and abetted racketeering activity by restricting property use, and by conspiring with private individuals and corporations to terrorize tax-paying citizens.

AR zoning: “Existing animal keeping uses in the AR Agricultural-Residential District which become nonconforming by reason of development on an adjoining site which was vacant when the animal keeping use was established may be continued indefinitely; provided, however, if the animal keeping use is abandoned or discontinued for a period of eighteen (18) months, it shall not be resumed except in conformity with the provisions of Section 9-3.420 of this article. The County is liable for illegally proposing (extortion) that citizens be given 18 months to get rid of chickens or face charges” in order to threaten and intimidate citizens to give up their property rights, which is a “scheme or artifice to defraud under color of official right.” The County is liable for any of its employees/agents using extortion, threats, fear and intimidation to coerce citizens to “amend” their Deeds and give up their property rights without just compensation or due process, and for falsely purporting that if the chickens or other livestock/small farm animals are gone for 18 months, the County can then fraudulently “amend” the owner’s deed, illegally convert the title, and get rid of the Prop 13 tax break.

Jones v. United States, 529 U.S.__, 146 L Ed 2d 902, 120 S.Ct___ (May 22, 2000): “Held: Because an owner-occupied residence not used for any commercial purpose does not qualify as property ‘used in’ commerce or commerce-affecting activity, arson of such a dwelling is not subject to…prosecution…” The Supreme Court says that you cannot be prosecuted by anybody for damaging your own property. The county is liable for its employees/agents’ fraud, perjury, and extortion to steal property under the guise of “rescuing” it from its lawful owner.

PROPERTY OWNER’S STANDING TO SUE UNDER RICO

Rotella v. Wood, 528 US__, 145 Led 2d 1047, 120 SCt.__, at pg. 1047: “The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (18 U.S.C.S §§ 1961 et seq.) provides that (1) it is unlawful to conduct an enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (2) a pattern requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, the last of which occurs within 10 years after the commission of a prior act (18 USCS § 1962(c), (3) a person injured by a RICO violation can bring a civil RICO action (18 USCS 1964(c)).” Any person injured by racketeering activity can file a civil RICO lawsuit. “Racketeering activity” is anything which interferes with land use and property rights – threats, fear, false process, false liens, etc.
C:\Users\Maria\Desktop\PRIMER ON EMINENT DOMAIN RIGHTS - Copy.mht

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by equal rights on 12/22/2014 at 4:33 PM

Re: “Tennessee Lawmakers Defend Cockfighting

HISTORY LESSON ON ANIMAL RIGHTS AND TYRANNY

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Hitler's Nazi Germany was marked by a preoccupation with "animal rights." Hitler's Third Reich passed numerous animal protection laws, such as declaring that shoeing a horse was cruel, and declared an end to dissection. This reduced Man’s status to that of animals, and justified treating men as animals. Before the war was ended, the Nazis stepped up experiments on the best way to castrate a Jew without anesthesia, and turned countless men, women and children into lampshades and soap. These Nazi actions were justifiable by their belief that it was possible to "...increase the moral standing of animals and decrease the moral standing of people, thus integrating human characteristics to animals... elevating animal life to the level of cult worship...which would lead to the spiritual and ideological changes necessary... for a new national identity."

The real political objective of “animal rights” is to eliminate "unalienable rights," and to make way for all these other supposed rights and pervert our Bill of Rights to the point where only the perverted are protected. A favored socialist strategy is to separate the population from common sense and its own laws by bringing about chaos, clouding real issues, then bring about “change” through gradual “legislation from within.” Ruling by planned crisis is the favored method, as this short-circuits the brain’s ability to think and reason clearly about true issues. This planned chaos (such as “animal cruelty,” “puppy mills” and “cock fighting”) is designed to rob the nation of its creativity and life force, degrade human existence, make everything seem uncontrollable and bad, which then allows the introduction of a tyrannical form of government.

The Gestapo was first used by Goring to do away with political opponents. A "temporary" state of emergency was declared after the Reichstag fire, but was never rescinded. This allowed the Gestapo to enforce conformity at every level of society. Block wardens monitored their neighbors, and children were recruited to inform on their teachers and parents. The Gestapo was authorized to hold people in "protective custody" which was really arbitrary arrest and imprisonment. At first, only political prisoners were taken under the guise of "preventive protective custody" and placed in SS-controlled concentration camps; later, anyone was hunted down and taken who was deemed to not fit in with SS and Gestapo vision of a perfect Aryan society. ("SS" came from Schutzstaffel which means "elite guard").

Today we see this same conduct and set of circumstances appearing in some of our civic institutions. The only way for one man to achieve dominion and control over another is through the darkness of IGNORANCE. Let’s get educated about our own laws, so that tyranny cannot gain a foothold in America, and so that we can once again have “happiness and good government flowing forth” as paraphrased by all our early education laws. We do have some beautiful laws. Let’s learn them, and insist that our civic institutions obey them for the good of our nation. God Bless America.





-Compiled by: Janet I. Fischer and S.A. Martin

17954-A S. Euclid Ave.

Chino, CA 91710

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by equal rights on 12/22/2014 at 4:30 PM

Re: “Tennessee Lawmakers Defend Cockfighting

ITs' IMMORAL & Unconstitutional to IMPOSE ONCE Personal Moral Chicken values to others, the anti-cockfighting laws SPONSORED by a private VEGAN nontaxpaying Economic TERRORIST org,
http://www.hsussucks.com/

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by equal rights on 12/22/2014 at 4:28 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

What a surprise. The incompetent hack Attorney General straight out of Gov. Doofus' office sides with the teabagger crazies in this insane lawsuit. You are right, Casual Observer, there is no standing under the law, and the lawsuits are doomed to dismissal.

I regret any effort to save the seats of those three spineless cowards on the Supreme Court, who managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And missed their opportunity to retain an actually competent and worthy Attorney General.

And, despite the hyperventilating of talk radio blowhards and their sycophantic dittohead moron followers, there is no merit in the argument that Executive Orders from every single previous President are perfectly fine, but any Executive Order from President Obama is "unconstitutional." He is still the President and is acting well within his authority, even if he is black.

21 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Perry Aubric on 12/22/2014 at 4:20 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

I'm sure Dave Francis isn't coming back to this site to check responses, largely because that was a giant cut and paste job that is probably on countless comment boards, but it's incredibly inaccurate and very indicative of the alternative universe that "conservatives" have been living in of late. When you say, "Look what he has done so far. This rogue president has issued executive order after executive order like post-it notes," you've lost any intelligent, non rigidly partisan people. There is a disconnect between reality and the mythical Obama people like you blabber on and on about. So, not that it matters to right-wing automatons like you, but click on the link and educate yourself about the number of executive actions (which are legal by the way) that "Majesty Obama" has issued.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders…

26 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by Chris Allen on 12/22/2014 at 3:21 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

Gosh, Kosh, you're way off base. There's a big difference the actions of Obama and Reagan.
"Reagan and Bush acted in conjunction with Congress and in furtherance of a congressional purpose.” Frum writes. “In 1986, Congress passed a full-blown amnesty, the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, conferring residency rights on some 3 million people.” In other words, Ronald Reagan signed a statute that had already been debated and passed by Congress, where as Obama is set to write and enact a law by himself."
http://www.infowars.com/obama-lies-about-p…

12 likes, 27 dislikes
Posted by yoyo moi on 12/22/2014 at 2:09 PM

Re: “Why Would the GOP Torture Its Base Like This?

Isn't a navy mess hall called the "poop deck?'

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by yoyo moi on 12/22/2014 at 2:03 PM

Re: “Tennessee Joins Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Immigration Action

The only differences between immigration executive action ( or any executive action)taken by Reagan and Obama is that Reagan is a Tea Party deity, Obama is an uppity usurping muslim colored boy in THEIR White House.

32 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by Kosh III on 12/22/2014 at 1:50 PM

Sign Up! For the Scene's email newsletters





* required

All contents © 1995-2014 City Press LLC, 210 12th Ave. S., Ste. 100, Nashville, TN 37203. (615) 244-7989.
All rights reserved. No part of this service may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of City Press LLC,
except that an individual may download and/or forward articles via email to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
Powered by Foundation