Most Popular

Blogs

Recent Articles

Recent Articles by John Pitcher

  • Operatic Revival

    Elmer Gantry sings to the converted in Nashville Opera’s world-premiere production

  • Russian Roulette

    Pianist Olga Kern alternates between grace and bombast at the Schermerhorn

  • Hot Art, Cool Show

    Rey Alfonso combines extreme temperatures and a vivid imagination

  • Long-Haired Music

    Delilah gets Samson and the spotlight in this classic French opera

  • He’s Got Rhythm

    Jazz composer Larry Lapin helps classical music find its voice

National Features >

  • City Pages

    "Governor No"

    Minnesota's Tim Pawlenty grooms himself for vice-presidential consideration--by being a jerk.

    By Jonathan Kaminsky

  • Miami New Times

    Day Strippers

    Our reporter sets out in search of a naked lunch.

    By Janine Zeitlin

  • Broward-Palm Beach New Times

    Switch Hitter

    Before swinging a bat in a lesbian softball league, pick a side: gay or straight?

    By Amy Guthrie

  • Village Voice

    Death in the Skies

    At JFK, Erhan Yildirim clears corpses for takeoff.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

Silenced Sexuality

Arts Commission declines to show artist Cindy Rehm’s ‘suggestive’ videos

John Pitcher

Published on May 24, 2007

What’s it take to get the Tennessee Arts Commission to pull the plug on an exhibit? Try sending them something with a little nudity in it.

Cindy Rehm, recipient of the agency’s prestigious 2006 Tennessee Arts Commission Individual Artist Fellowship in Media, found that out the hard way when TAC refused to display four of her videos this month. At least one of the videos depicted partially clad women using their bodies to pass fruit back and forth.

“You could argue that image was homoerotic,” says one source familiar with the video. “But it was definitely quality art.” Last week, the National Coalition Against Censorship sent a letter to Nicole Pietrantoni, director of TAC’s Visual Arts, Craft and Media Program protesting the refusal to exhibit Rehm’s videos.

“As winner of TAC’s Individual Artist Fellowship in Media Award, Ms. Rehm was invited to have a show at the TAC gallery,” the letter states. “Shortly after she delivered the works, however, you rejected the videos because one of them contained partial nudity and the others were, in your words, ‘too suggestive.’ You gave Ms. Rehm the option to show some of her older videos. Suspecting that those, too, would be ‘too suggestive,’ she declined.”

Rich Boyd, TAC’s executive director, denied the censorship charge. Though he conceded there was some nudity in the video, he insisted that had nothing to do with the agency’s refusal to display it.

“The problem with the video wasn’t the nudity but rather a lack of artistic value,” Boyd says. “We’re already displaying her drawing, but the video wasn’t as good as her other work. Also, I should add that we’re not obliged to show her work, and for that matter [TAC] isn’t even required to run a gallery service or show anything.”

“That’s positively absurd,” responds Justin Goldberg, a spokesman for the National Coalition Against Censorship. “What’s he going to do, clear the Tennessee Arts Commission of art? TAC’s mission is to show and support art. TAC is also a governmental entity and has a higher First Amendment obligation not to hold back on free speech.”

One thing’s for sure: TAC should have known what it was getting itself into with Rehm. Earlier this month, the agency sent out a postcard inviting art lovers to a reception in Rehm’s honor. And that card, which featured a facsimile of the artist’s pen-and-ink drawing “The Lack,” described Rehm as a performance artist whose work “explores identity, eroticism and obsession.”

Reached last week, Rehm, a Murfreesboro artist, declined comment and referred all questions to Hedy Weinberg of the Tennessee American Civil Liberties Union. “I definitely think this is a question of censorship on its face,” Weinberg says. “Rehm is an award-winning artist and was invited to participate. So we’re in contact with her and looking into the case, and we’re concerned that there appears to be a pattern here.”

Indeed, in 2001 TAC refused to exhibit the work of artist Ernie Sandidge because some of his paintings featured nude figures. The National Coalition Against Censorship at the time accused TAC of having an unofficial “no nude figures” policy.



Nashville Scene Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff
Backpage.com