Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

National Features >

  • Houston Press

    Hate to Say We Told You So

    A year before Toyota's massive recall, we published a lengthy investigation of problems with the Prius.

    By Paul Knight

  • Miami New Times

    Sex, Drugs, Gambling--and Football

    Heading to Miami for the Super Bowl? Don't leave the hotel without our guide to vice in the Magic City.

    By Michael J. Mooney and Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    Life in the Blue Zone

    Daredevil Dan Buettner's latest trick? Bringing the secrets of immortality to Minnesota.

    By Erin Carlyle

  • Phoenix New Times

    The Greatest Dane

    Bigger than Shaq and proud of it, the world's tallest dog may be living in Tucson.

    By James King

Dead Wrong

Continued from page 1

Share

  • rss

Published on June 26, 2008

That’s a sentiment echoed by many critics of prosecutor Paul Phillips, the longtime district attorney general of Tennessee’s 8th District, which includes rural Union County. The fact that he’s not seeking the death penalty this time offers little relief given that the ill inmate might very well die in prison before the legal wrangling in his case ends.

Frustrated by this “sad situation,” Judge Merritt says, “I do not think the state should be able to retry this guy who has been on death row for 22 years and has multiple sclerosis and probably not too many years left to live.”

For three decades, Assistant District Attorney Paul Phillips has had the final say on who should and should not be tried in the five rural counties he oversees. The entrenched prosecutor is a native of East Tennessee, and comes from a family with an impressive legal pedigree—his brother is U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Phillips from the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Over the last six months, Phillips has sat beside lawyers with the state attorney general’s office as they argued that House does not deserve a new trial. Typically decked out in dark three-piece suits, the husky, white-haired prosecutor has appeared stern and unwavering during most proceedings, but on a few occasions has become visibly flustered by remarks from House’s lawyer Stephen Kissinger. At one point, when Kissinger argued that Phillips had previously announced he intended to seek the death penalty again, the prosecutor jumped from his seat, holding his finger in the air and shouting, “I did not. I did not say that.”

But the transcript from the hearing on Feb. 28, 2008, doesn’t lie. Phillips most certainly did make that statement: “We will retry Mr. House.… I would expect that we would seek capital punishment.”

Although the prosecutor later stated in court that he would not seek the death penalty because of House’s chronic illness, some have speculated the decision instead stems from having a weak case, suggesting that the state might even offer a plea deal.

Having personally prosecuted hundreds upon hundreds of criminal cases, Phillips, a Vanderbilt Law School graduate, has established a reputation as an aggressive lawyer with a knack for persuading juries. Colleagues say he’s a tough yet fair-minded attorney, and even the defense lawyers he opposes in the courtroom have described him as reasonable. Which is why his decision to retry Paul House is so befuddling.

“I’m puzzled at why Paul Phillips is proceeding in this manner,” says Randall Reagan, a Knoxville-based defense lawyer. Having known Phillips for at least 30 years, Reagan calls him a hard-nosed prosecutor, but one who has always been willing to listen.

So what explains Phillips’ deaf ear when the highest court in the land has essentially telegraphed the message to back off?

“Phillips personally prosecuted this case back then, so I’m sure he’s heavily invested in it emotionally, intellectually, professionally,” Reagan says. “And sometimes prosecutors hate to admit mistakes.”

If Phillips simply conceded that House might have spent half his life on death row for a crime he didn’t commit, it would trigger renewed attacks on Tennessee’s already controversial capital justice system. In fact, if some death penalty advocates had their way, House would have been executed years ago. It would also be demoralizing for Phillips (or any prosecutor) to admit that one of the biggest cases he ever tried—one that had a tiny East Tennessee town buzzing over 20 years ago—turned out to be built on a fundamental misreading of the evidence.

Some lawyers believe Phillips has simply lost his perspective in the case. Even without admitting error, Phillips could just cite the Supreme Court’s decision that “no reasonable juror” would convict House and drop the case, particularly since retrying the matter 23 years after the crime will be a challenge of Olympian proportions. Perhaps the most difficult task will be tracking down witnesses after all these years, many of whom have moved away. Even the ones who can be located might have a tough time remembering events that occurred more than 20 years ago. There’s even a handful of witnesses who have died, or are too sick to testify.

But Phillips is taking a hard line, refusing to budge.

“It’s a way to justify the time House spent on death row, a way to justify the loss of his youth and reputation, and it’s a way to try to justify a broken capital system in Tennessee,” says Robert Kurtz, a defense lawyer who practices throughout East Tennessee, including Union County.

In the close-knit, poor country town of Luttrell, Tenn., word spread quickly on the morning of Sunday July 14, 1985, that Carolyn Muncey was missing. Situated in the shadows of the Smoky Mountains, the town of less than four square miles and 1,000 people was buzzing with the news that something had happened.

« Previous Page   1   2   3   4   5   6   Next Page »