Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

National Features >

  • Houston Press

    Hate to Say We Told You So

    A year before Toyota's massive recall, we published a lengthy investigation of problems with the Prius.

    By Paul Knight

  • Miami New Times

    Sex, Drugs, Gambling--and Football

    Heading to Miami for the Super Bowl? Don't leave the hotel without our guide to vice in the Magic City.

    By Michael J. Mooney and Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    Life in the Blue Zone

    Daredevil Dan Buettner's latest trick? Bringing the secrets of immortality to Minnesota.

    By Erin Carlyle

  • Phoenix New Times

    The Greatest Dane

    Bigger than Shaq and proud of it, the world's tallest dog may be living in Tucson.

    By James King

Stuck in Neutral

'Crash' arrives dead on impact

Share

  • rss

Noel Murray and Jim Ridley

Published on March 27, 1997

If you’ve ever been in a nasty car accident, you’ve probably had this moment: lying awake at night, staring at the ceiling, trying, even years after the fact, to recollect exactly what happened. Thinking, “If only I’d swerved this way, I might’ve avoided the crash altogether. On the other hand, if I’d swerved that way....” And your heart drops at the thought. There’s nothing quite like the collision of metal with metal to draw lines in your mind. One moment your car is running fine, the next it’s scrap. One moment your body is functioning, the next...well, best not to think about it.

A crash is a memorable, emotional experience, full of possibilities and consequences. It haunts a person, especially in the way it underscores the mutual fragility of man and machine. Both have a baseline level of functionality that can, and does, cease.

David Cronenberg’s film Crash (based on the novel by J.G. Ballard) is about a handful of haunted men and women who inhabit an abstract urban landscape. Each of them has survived an automobile accident, and each of them has been rattled in exactly the same way—they’ve become obsessed in equal measure with car crashes and with sex.

James Spader stars as James, a commercial director who kills a man in a head-on collision and simultaneously injures the dead man’s wife, a doctor played by Holly Hunter. After a chance encounter at an impound lot, James and the doctor attend a lecture by a performance artist named Vaughn (Elias Koteas)—a self-proclaimed prophet who specializes in recreating the car crashes of the rich and famous. James is fascinated by Vaughn and his theories, and he asks Vaughn to chase his wife (Deborah Kara Unger) around the freeway, just to give her a thrill. The wife digs it. Being chased and threatened feeds into her exhibitionist, thrill-seeking libido.

In between the bumper scraping and the historical reenactments, there’s a liberal dose of sexual activity. Everybody (and I mean everybody) partners up before the curtain falls in Crash. Cronenberg films the sex scenes and the wreckage of cars with the same languorous tracking shots and supple lighting, drawing a sloping, crumpled line between the tangled bodies of sexual partners and of accident victims.

It’s clear what attracted Cronenberg to Ballard’s novel. For a director famed for his obsession with the decaying human form (in films like The Fly, Rabid, Naked Lunch, and Dead Ringers), the opportunity to study sexual perversion in concert with the fractal geometry of an accident scene (with its harried emergency workers and steaming radiator grilles) is almost too tempting.

Unfortunately, the director undershoots his target. Perhaps fearing that the material is too inherently volatile, Cronenberg keeps Crash spare and restrained, with minimal dialogue and little reaction from his actors. The result is a film full of charged, compelling images, but devoid of even the most basic human emotion. That this flatness is a conscious choice by Cronenberg makes it no less bothersome. Spader, Hunter, and company are yeomen enough to lift their shirts and drop their pants at Cronenberg’s behest; the least he owes them are characters of substance.

Instead, they’re more like robots, free of any motivation save what their creator wishes them to do. What is it about crashes that turns them on, exactly? What draws them to Vaughn? Have their lives been changed, or were they always like this? The principals’ actions seem to have no meaning, and the scene-to-scene transitions in Crash leave the viewer generally befuddled as to what’s going on and who’s involved. When the end credits roll up, one wonders, why now? Why not 10 minutes earlier or 10 minutes later? Leaving aside the (probably unanswerable) question of what Cronenberg may be trying to say, what makes him even think Crash is finished?

Crash has stirred up controversy for its subject matter and its NC-17 rating, but frankly, I doubt any but the most rigid prude would feel more than mild disquiet over Cronenberg’s clinical approach. If he’d gotten inside the heads of those who’ve approached the boundary of death and returned, or tried to understand why they might feel the need to mock the experience by turning it into sexual fantasy—if he’d dared to make an exciting movie about how death can inspire sex—Crash might’ve been truly shocking. Instead, it’s hard to imagine anyone but David Cronenberg lying awake at night, staring at the ceiling, thinking about Crash.—Noel Murray

This Boy’s Life

A gruff but lovable bachelor whose selfish ways are changed by a 6-year-old boy—only chugging a quart of Hai Karate could induce vomiting faster than the synopsis of Kolya, the Czech import that won this year’s Oscar for Best Foreign Film. The movie, however, is much more enjoyable (and much less cloying) than its plot would suggest—thanks largely to the roguish, melancholy charisma of Zdenek Sverak as Frantisek Louka, a former symphony cellist living in disgrace in Prague in 1989 during the waning days of Russian occupation.

1   2   Next Page »